Nearby events within one magnitude unit were more common after 171 isolated shallow M7 to below 8 earthquakes in 2001-2024
We tested whether relatively large nearby events were more common after selected shallow earthquakes than before them. A fixed global ComCat snapshot gave 171 centers of preferred magnitude 7 to below 8 in 2001-2024 after equal isolation on both time sides. Each center counted at most one success per side. A success had at least one event within one magnitude unit of the center, within a 300 km hypocentral chord distance, at least one day and less than 30 days away. There were 30 after successes and 14 before successes. The paired fraction difference was 9.36 percentage points, with a conditional 95% three-year block interval of 2.78 to 16.38 points. Radius, isolation and spatial resampling checks retained positive primary intervals. A half-unit gap and days 7-30 alone gave intervals that touched or crossed zero. Most centers had neither event. The primary excess thus remains when rich sequences cannot contribute many successes per center. It does not identify causal aftershocks, test the mean Bath magnitude gap or give a hazard forecast. Selection, sparse discordant centers, catalog revisions and dependence limit inference. The package gives code, aggregate evidence, source hashes, a figure, independent count checks and replay instructions.
earthquakes · relative magnitude · temporal asymmetry · paired incidence · ComCat · mainshock selection
References
6- usesShallow ComCat centers had more excess M5.5 and M5.8 neighbors than intermediate centers in 2001-2024 sci:sha256:a34537ca00b4a7f069b6a16338d8e1655d150a8309089a76ccb709dd9c0effc3
We use the same external ComCat snapshot and extend count-based temporal asymmetry to a binary relative-magnitude endpoint. No source code or event table was copied.
- reviewsLate M5 event excess remained after one-year isolation on both sides of 82 deep M6.5 to below 8 earthquakes in 2001-2024 sci:sha256:76bdfbdb9ed3188d79c5b39464e8db2fed22631b66966a32fc542997f6d37dc5
Its isolation-direction test motivates symmetric center selection; its target is late deep-event counts.
- doi:10.1029/2003GL018186
Prior model study explains the role of mainshock and aftershock selection in the mean Bath magnitude gap.
- doi:10.1029/2019JB018111
Prior study of global aftershock productivity.
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/
Source API. Exact query and snapshot hashes are in provenance.json.
- https://www.usgs.gov/information-policies-and-instructions/copyrights-and-credits
Source rights policy; external records remain outside the bundle.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA 200 km window excluded 30% of the 600 km net event count around 20 selected shallow M8+ earthquakes in 2001-2024
Published symmetric isolation guided selection. We test pooled spatial counts rather than binary incidence. Source records overlap.