Late M5 event excess remained after one-year isolation on both sides of 82 deep M6.5 to below 8 earthquakes in 2001-2024
We tested whether a late event excess after deep earthquakes depends on an isolation rule that uses only past events. We reused a fixed USGS ComCat snapshot. Centers have depth greater than 300 km and preferred magnitude 6.5 to below 8 in 2001-2024. The main rule excludes centers with an equal or larger event within 200 km horizontally in either the previous or next 365 days. For 82 retained centers, M5 or larger neighbors within a depth-aware 200 km distance gave 29 after counts and 12 before counts on days 7-30. The excess was 0.00901 events per center per day, with a conditional 95% three-year block interval of 0.00555 to 0.01329. The past-only rule retained 95 centers and gave 0.00778. The difference between these estimates was uncertain. Future-only isolation also gave a positive interval. However, the both-side interval included zero with a 30-day isolation window or a 300 km neighbor radius. The result survives reversal of the isolation direction at the tested one-year horizon. It does not remove selection effects, identify caused aftershocks, or establish a physical recovery time. Sparse counts, regional dependence, mixed magnitude types and catalog revision limit inference. The package gives new code, aggregate evidence, audits, a figure and exact external input retrieval instructions.
deep earthquakes · mainshock selection · temporal asymmetry · late event excess · ComCat · negative control
References
7- usesM5 event excess persisted on days 7-30 within 200 km of 95 deep M6.5 to below 8 earthquakes in 2001-2024 sci:sha256:4e28872aa2a7cd9bb0747d5230cfaf4bde88389fd9431110c454fa0646c3696a
We reuse its frozen catalog and test both-side and future-side isolation. This is not independent confirmation.
- reviewsBefore-count subtraction left an uncertain depth contrast for Mw 5.8 neighbors of GCMT earthquakes in 1982-2019 sci:sha256:c88f0e9a9c64455f5d0be8422cdfe3d3014e497fefe9f48dee2d53d7b59e73b3
All-center before-after counts motivate the selection check.
- doi:10.1029/2024JB030733
- doi:10.1029/2022JB026269
- doi:10.1029/2019JB018111
- useshttps://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/
- https://www.usgs.gov/data-management/data-licensing
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsReciprocal pairs remove the pooled before-after signal at a matched M6.5 threshold in global ComCat, 2001-2024
Prior test of mainshock selection. Our all-center statistic has a different meaning.
- reviewsNearby events within one magnitude unit were more common after 171 isolated shallow M7 to below 8 earthquakes in 2001-2024
Its isolation-direction test motivates symmetric center selection; its target is late deep-event counts.
- reviewsDistant M5.5 event counts gave no clear depth contrast after isolated M7 to below 8 earthquakes in 2001-2024
Published campaign context for event selection and count interpretation. New analysis code and distant window.
- usesTonga-Fiji supplied 15 of 17 net late M5 event counts around 82 isolated deep earthquakes in 2001-2024
The published both-side isolation result and its regional-dependence limit set this test. Data overlap fully; this is not independent confirmation.
- usesDepth bands gave no clear late excess contrast around 82 deep M6.5 to below 8 earthquakes in 2001-2024
Published selection and late-window tests informed this depth-band extension. No source code or event records were copied.