Local stellar rotation terms did not reduce prediction error for 593 later Kepler-1520 b transits in a fixed linear test
We tested whether a measured stellar rotation wave adds information about Kepler-1520 b transits beyond recent transit history. We used 17 public Kepler DR25 light curves. Local fits measured a sine term and cosine term at a period of 22.9 days from flux outside transit. The target orbit was excluded from their fit and normalization. The stellar fit used flux before and after the event. Thus this is a conditional test, not a blind forecast. We fitted two linear rules on 525 events in quarters 1 through 8. Their coefficients stayed fixed for 593 events in quarters 9 through 17. Adding the stellar terms increased mean squared error by 0.190%. Root mean squared error rose from 606.033 to 606.608 parts per million. A conditional 95% range for the error reduction was -1.965% to +1.423% with 35-orbit blocks. Ranges from longer blocks and separate early and late resampling also included zero. Seven well-sampled cases gave no detected gain. A strict quality check had only 16 fit events and was unstable. A constant-transit control gave a 10.93 parts per million RMS difference between smooth and flat stellar curves. These results limit the stated fixed linear rule. They do not exclude nonlinear or changing stellar effects. Earlier work already tested rotation modulation, local flux and past-only harmonics. This contribution supplies a distinct two-sided conditional test and its measured harmonic ledger. The package preserves raw data, provenance, source code, all predictions, controls, figures and offline reproduction instructions.
Kepler-1520 b · KIC 12557548 · disintegrating planets · stellar rotation · conditional prediction · transit variability · reproducible astronomy
References
10- usesThe previous transit reduced squared prediction error by 4.5% for 769 later Kepler-1520 b transits with fixed rotation terms sci:sha256:cd427b7f5b1d84facb3f5ebd783a1083d4369fe1a7c841705ef172b5422436e5
We reuse its source data, fixed ephemeris and unchanged MIT code for transit measurement, history inputs, OLS and conditional block ranges.
- usesA fixed profile test does not detect a tail response after one orbit in Kepler-1520 b quarters 9–17 sci:sha256:04c25bbfb275121779b082d0a2749082969177eae50608b6903fe09194f04302
We use its unchanged copy of the source light curves and ephemeris provenance. Its separate core-to-tail test motivates no claim here.
- Local flux inputs reduced squared test error by 0.90% for 769 Kepler-1520 b transits with shared linear baselines sci:sha256:ae6dc8b1147a300a1aff843f343fb9525763e68b32453f73fe6b9548689019c7
This earlier study tests local flux and slope, shared baseline errors and separate samples. Our measured harmonics exclude the full target orbit. We reuse no code from this study.
- Three past flux inputs increased squared error by 0.83% in a fixed linear test of 522 Kepler-1520 b transits sci:sha256:2b418b70304078d0fd86e07ec02b3bc9a1245fe93e7694970a9f7db1a456a3e8
This earlier study tests local harmonics from past flux only. Our conditional test uses both sides of the event, a different basis and different rows. Their absolute errors are not a direct method comparison.
- doi:10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/1
This paper reports the variable transits and proposed dusty planet.
- doi:10.1088/2041-8205/776/1/L6
This paper reports transit-depth modulation near the stellar rotation period.
- usesdoi:10.1093/mnras/stv297
We use the reported 22.9 day stellar period. This paper already finds stronger rotation modulation in the first half of the record and tests measurement effects.
- doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322398
This paper studies transit statistics and stellar intensity with different measurements.
- doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaeb32
This paper studies Kepler profile changes and a component near 22.9 days. Evolving profile analysis is prior work.
- doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629250
This paper gives physical dust-tail models. Our empirical prediction score is not a dust model.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.