High-gamma timing shifted partly with reaction time in 3 of 8 patients with responsive SEEG pairs
In a cued left/right key-press task, we tested whether single-trial high-gamma (70–150 Hz) timing in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) bipolar pairs followed the go cue or the key press. We analyzed eight patients from OpenNeuro ds004473, splitting trials into independent even-position (set A) and odd-position (set B) halves. A pooled alignment slope k measured timing shifts, where 0 indicates stimulus locking and 1 response locking. The planned single-trial Woody slope failed a synthetic check (mean 0.31 for a response-locked bump with true slope 1), so we selected k on synthetic data before calculating real slopes. Nineteen pairs in three patients had significant high-gamma increases in set A; five patients had none. Their group mean k was 0.54 in set A and 0.32 in set B, above the reaction-time-shuffle null means (0.04 and 0.03; one-sided p = 0.005 and 0.010). Pair-level timing agreement between halves was supported by a post-hoc pooled Spearman correlation of 0.49 (within-subject permutation p = 0.048). The shift was partial, and one patient did not replicate. There was no support for an association between k and template peak time. Inference is limited to three patients with responsive pairs: a test across patients cannot yield p < 0.125, and the planned sign-flip p was 0.125. The result applies only to contacts with clear high-gamma increases; five patients had no responsive pair under the selection rule. Bootstrap and permutation counts were 200. Clinical contact placement and the 0.15–1.1 s reaction-time range also limit interpretation.
stereoelectroencephalography · high-gamma activity · reaction time · stimulus locking · response locking · alignment slope · OpenNeuro ds004473 · trial timing
References
4- usesSparse SEEG sampling did not show contralateral lateralization of movement-related high-gamma or beta responses in 8 patients sci:sha256:927b68d47b77e3367bcc7c4580e48c00a56dfe67fa94aa4fdcd4267d8e61f6eb
Same dataset (ds004473) and task. That work tested HG/beta lateralization and found few responsive pairs (sparse motor coverage), which agrees with our 3 of 8 patients with responsive pairs. We used it to choose a different, untested question (HG timing relative to stimulus and response).
- usesIn 8 SEEG patients (OpenNeuro ds004473), beta power in the 0.5 s before the Go cue did not predict key-press reaction time from trial to trial (pre-registered test, 834 bipolar pairs, 1,921 trials) sci:sha256:3f9ee211922b692b3f191ebe68654b2b6582746888dd9f12e134ba371a66d605
Prior pre-registered test on this dataset: pre-cue beta power did not predict RT. We used it to define the gap; our work tests whether HG timing (not power) follows RT.
- usesTrial-by-trial SEEG band power did not predict reaction time in movement-responsive pairs sci:sha256:d3b3c3ff94ab6b15c9c4a31ff6ede6402f5d82aa0b86e75295af10a6ee65f032
Prior test on this dataset: beta and response-locked HG power did not predict RT trial by trial. Our result is complementary: HG timing (not power) moved partly with RT in the 3 patients with HG increases.
- usesdoi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Facae0a
The publication analyzes SEEG recordings from the OpenNeuro ds004473 study described by Rockhill et al.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsMost task-responsive SEEG pairs did not show resolvable Go-cue or key-press locking
Independent pipeline on the same data (all trials up to RT 2.0 s, BH t-test selection, cross-validated template test and tercile lag index L). For the shafts that 61bcf920 names, our pair results agree in direction: sub-2 RSMA Go-cue side (12 of 13 pairs D < 0, median L 0.00, 3 significant), sub-2 LPCN 4-5 to 6-7 key-press side (L 0.56-1.44, 1 significant), sub-9 LSSENS 2-3 to 5-6 key-press side (D > 0, L 0.48-0.89, not significant). Our median L over 72 pairs (0.40) is in their group k range (0.32-0.54).