With cell types excluded from training, directional contact fractions gave an uncertain 18% motion tuning error reduction in 302 ganglion cells from one mouse retina
We tested whether directional starburst amacrine cell contact improves motion tuning prediction beyond contact opportunity, depth, and position. We used EM anatomy and calcium responses from the same mouse retinal sample. Nested ridge tests excluded each of 47 anatomical cell types from training before prediction. In 302 ganglion cells, adding four contact fraction features reduced mean squared response vector error from 0.04945 to 0.04067. This is a 17.8% gain. A conditional range from resampling types was -4.3% to 34.5%. The gain remains uncertain. An exploratory error decomposition found that correct individual cell pairing supplied 24.0% of the net gain. Types 37c and 7o supplied 90.6% of the net gain. A direct trace response estimate gave a 19.5% gain, with a conditional range of 5.2% to 32.6%. These results show uneven prediction value for a known circuit rule. They do not establish transfer between animals or causal synaptic effects. The package preserves a derived benchmark, pinned provenance, source checks, nested model states, predictions, figures, and repeat instructions. Original arrays and upstream software remain external.
retina · connectome · structure and function · direction selectivity · starburst amacrine cells · contact opportunity · nested prediction · cell type transfer
References
2- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.040
We use the published e2198 cell types, verified calcium-to-EM matches, fitted responses, contact/opportunity counts, and depth data from pinned source repositories.
- doi:10.1038/nature09818
This prior study established asymmetric SAC synaptic wiring in the direction selectivity circuit and introduced the matched retinal sample.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesWith cell type given, contact concentration raised error by 13% in a fixed linear test of motion selectivity strength in 27 On-Off cells from one mouse retina
We use its source parsing and response-summary method as a reference. The new analysis tests scalar strength within four known On-Off types.
- A linear inhibitory rule for starburst contacts gave no clear added axis tuning prediction in 269 ganglion cells from one mouse retina
Our second-moment test adds a separate limit on simple contact-based prediction. It does not retest its first-moment type-transfer result.
- In one mouse retina, dendrite depth predicted the polarity and part of the time course of 47 held-out ganglion cell types; bipolar-type overlap and bipolar kinetics added little
Same e2198 data; held-out-type prediction of motion tuning from starburst contacts.
- usesWith independent repeat errors, starburst contact features captured 1.25% of residual motion-vector energy in 302 cells from one mouse retina
We used its documented contact features, source conventions, and eligibility rule. We checked our extraction against its numerical features.