sciscape Publications
← All publications

With independent repeat errors, starburst contact features captured 1.25% of residual motion-vector energy in 302 cells from one mouse retina

We tested whether starburst contact features carry stable motion response information beyond cell type and imaging recording. The data came from one mouse retina. We used 302 matched ganglion cells in 47 types and four repeats. With independent errors between repeats, cross-products estimate stable response energy without within-repeat noise bias. Four contact features captured 1.25 percent of residual stable energy. The mean after within-type cell-label shuffles was 2.09 percent. The one-sided shuffle tail was 0.6596. A descriptive recording-weight range was -0.74 to 15.95 percent. This range does not give an animal-population confidence interval. A planned check of 42 known direction-selective cells gave 43.73 percent alignment and an unadjusted tail of 0.0132. No planned sensitivity passed a 0.05 threshold after an eight-test correction. Added spatial controls reduced the subgroup estimate to 26.19 percent, with tail 0.3390. Shuffles within both type and recording gave tail 0.2462, with only 14 movable subgroup cells. The main test gives no clear evidence of added stable information in this global contact feature space. It does not test new-cell prediction or prove no contact effect. Fixed direction order, possible errors shared between repeats, one retina, and a bounded calcium statistic limit the result. We provide the trial-level feature data, a cross-repeat projection tool, checks of its assumptions, all planned and exploratory results, source provenance, code, and figures.

retina · structure and function · connectomics · starburst amacrine cells · motion coding · repeat noise · cross-repeat energy · reproducible dataset

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

8
  1. usesdoi:10.1038/nature09818

    The original study supplied the matched calcium imaging and electron microscopy observations.

  2. usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.040

    The source release supplied matched cell labels, membrane contact measures, depth profiles, and public traces.

  3. In one mouse retina, starburst contact direction predicted preferred motion direction within a median 12° for 26 On-Off and 23° for 7 transient On DS ganglion cells; arbor direction did not sci:sha256:d70a5a6322e8ec3db5b80f3d7871b4207590d3517332401bc14f8d9baeda0dc2

    This prior study tested contact direction and motion preference in the same retina.

  4. Local contact correction reduced motion prediction error in 27 cells from one mouse retina sci:sha256:be8277b484073d3a865b5e829d4dd0c2c24aaeedc71969d419baf8647372c367

    This prior study tested local contact correction in the same cells.

  5. usesWith cell types excluded from training, directional contact fractions gave an uncertain 18% motion tuning error reduction in 302 ganglion cells from one mouse retina sci:sha256:68bca6ee92aa35b528db8802c021db39fc418600ab6fd314d7ac087c407f0a08

    We used its documented contact features, source conventions, and eligibility rule. We checked our extraction against its numerical features.

  6. usesIn a fixed test of 5,542 pairs from one mouse retina, dendrite depth overlap gave an uncertain 0.21% error decrease for residual calcium correlation sci:sha256:a6a0657f730f1441a4f417980e6d8ec8b1739916d78994983049bbef69df6a35

    We reused its signed and verified map from cells to final imaging recordings under CC BY 4.0.

  7. usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.012

    The study gives prior cross-product methods that remove noise bias from response distances.

  8. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009212

    The study gives prior methods and limits for noise correction in neural model assessment.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.