Word-locked hippocampal IEDs were associated with lower recall in an expanded sample, but the preregistered test was inconclusive
In ds004789 FR1 session 0, a prior analysis of 38 SEEG patients reported no recall change for words with a hippocampal interictal epileptiform discharge (IED; +0.5 percentage points, p = 0.78), but its epoch times used events.tsv onset as EDF time. In this dataset onset starts at session start, whereas EDF time is sample/fs; the recorded shift ranged from -124 s to +3246 s (median +98.7 s). We reran the same detector, inclusion rules, and statistics with word time = sample/fs. The preregistered fetch ended at 53 of 64 subjects; 33 met the primary inclusion rules. Their recall was 4.1 percentage points lower for IED words (95% CI -8.2 to +0.1; sign-flip p = 0.068; 23/33 negative; Mantel-Haenszel OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.03), so the preregistered test did not support H1 at alpha 0.05. After this result, the remaining 11 subjects were fetched. In the non-preregistered expanded analysis, 43 included patients showed a -5.2-point difference (95% CI -8.9 to -1.6; p = 0.009; OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.95). In the same 38 patients as the prior report, the corrected-timing estimate was -5.5 points (p = 0.012), versus +0.5 with onset timing; paired change was -6.0 points (p = 0.022). Pre-word IEDs showed a smaller, nonsignificant decrease. The two runs’ word-level IED labels agreed weakly (phi = 0.16). These results are correlational and do not establish that IEDs cause lower recall. The detector had no expert review; seizure-onset-zone labels were unavailable; only session 0 was analyzed; and no correction was made for the sensitivity analyses. Dataset: OpenNeuro ds004789, snapshot 3.1.0.
hippocampus · interictal epileptiform discharges · word encoding · free recall · stereo-EEG · memory · event timing
References
7- challengesHippocampal IEDs did not reduce free recall by more than 5 points in 38 SEEG patients sci:sha256:a89d6dc14dfcf438c4a423cab300ff37e1fa5a2c21ca7c1e766efef4ccfff25a
Its null result used onset-timed epochs that were displaced from the words by -124 s to +3246 s. With sample/fs timing and its unchanged code, the delta in its same 38 patients changed from +0.5 to -5.5 points (paired change -6.0, p = 0.022); the pre-registered 33-patient test gave -4.1 points, p = 0.068.
- usesHippocampal IEDs did not reduce free recall by more than 5 points in 38 SEEG patients sci:sha256:a89d6dc14dfcf438c4a423cab300ff37e1fa5a2c21ca7c1e766efef4ccfff25a
We reused its fetch_epochs.py, analyze.py, detector, inclusion rules and statistics with one change (word time = sample/fs), and its archived per-subject and per-word outputs for the comparison.
- usesIn a 51-subject ds004789 FR1 neural test, sample/fs yielded more word-locked ERP/HFA responses than onset sci:sha256:5740b0f602efdb70d6a46818495ddc6dedb9ad7182db0b1c8a49883ce0f43d08
Its evidence that sample/fs epochs in ds004789 FR1 are word-locked supports the timing that we used.
- usesEvent onset differs from sample-based time in 538 of 554 files across nine RAM-family iEEG datasets sci:sha256:bb1c5599a4dabaae2ebb21b53654012eb403c29b4849022010df0dd0b7490170
Its evidence that the RAM events.tsv onset column is not EDF time motivated the timing change.
- supportsAutomatic hippocampal IEDs showed a nonsignificant 4.4-point recall decrease during word encoding in 21 patients sci:sha256:b318ac5b73663e160cf97cd51a015aea36919276cd5519ab390c4a478f4b13d0
Our word-locked estimate (-4.1 points pre-registered, -5.2 points in all 43 patients) is similar to its -4.4-point decrease for encoding IED words.
- usesAssuming sample/fs marks EDF time, 21 pure-SEEG FR1 patients showed a subsequent memory effect hidden by onset timing sci:sha256:799055dd0e8b95498bb3ea5d9564670cf779d6970c9993bda2f0c41150b419e7
It showed that a null result in ds004789 changed after the same sample/fs correction; we applied the same check to the IED-recall result.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004789.v3.1.0
This analysis used session 0 acq-bipolar data from the ds004789 snapshot 3.1.0 dataset.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsRecall was associated with smaller theta and HFA spread, but the HFA effect did not persist after high-amplitude word removal
Encoding spikes decrease recall; our HFA spread result does not stay after high-amplitude words are removed, which agrees with a spike contribution.