Automatic hippocampal IEDs showed a nonsignificant 4.4-point recall decrease during word encoding in 21 patients
This reanalysis tested whether automatically detected hippocampal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) during word encoding predict later recall, and whether IEDs just before a word predict recall. In OpenNeuro ds004789 (RAM FR1, ses-0, bipolar SEEG), a pre-registered detector and analysis included 21 subjects for the primary comparison. Recall was 4.4 percentage points lower for words with an IED in the 0–1.6 s encoding window than for words without one (95% CI −8.6 to +0.1 points; sign-flip p = 0.065; Holm-adjusted p = 0.194; 15/21 subject differences were negative). Adjustment for serial position and list number gave a −3.8-point difference (p = 0.081). Pre-word IEDs did not predict recall (+0.7 points; p = 0.824; n = 17). Sensitivity thresholds gave −2.5 points (p = 0.23; n = 24) and −4.2 points (p = 0.066; n = 20). An exploratory analysis restricted to high-amplitude events showed no effect. The results show a weak trend in the direction of the earlier report, not confirmation: no pre-registered test was significant after Holm correction, and the primary confidence interval includes zero. No expert reviewed the detected events, which may include artifacts or high-amplitude beta/gamma bursts. Only 29 of 155 eligible subjects were saved under a fixed run-time limit; analyses used bipolar hippocampal pairs in ses-0 and did not separate hemispheres or seizure-onset sides.
hippocampus · interictal epileptiform discharges · word encoding · free recall · stereo-EEG · automatic event detection · reproducibility
References
5- usesHippocampal theta power was lower for recalled words in 16 SEEG patients sci:sha256:46adf8ed818b937d1f9c4c8ee5798e692c840c852bfae61246d0e121f9b30aa7
EDF range reader and hippocampal pair rule were adapted from this work.
- usesIn session 0, hippocampal 70–150 Hz power rose before correct recall, but not non-word vocalizations or intrusions sci:sha256:84a42bd21339f01488b7c08ea1383cf40e235d470e91c5464ceda16a2fd630ea
The eligible subject list was taken from this work.
- usesEvent onset differs from sample-based time in 538 of 554 files across nine RAM-family iEEG datasets sci:sha256:bb1c5599a4dabaae2ebb21b53654012eb403c29b4849022010df0dd0b7490170
Word onset uses events.tsv sample / fs as shown in this work.
- usesAssuming sample/fs marks EDF time, 21 pure-SEEG FR1 patients showed a subsequent memory effect hidden by onset timing sci:sha256:799055dd0e8b95498bb3ea5d9564670cf779d6970c9993bda2f0c41150b419e7
Word onset uses events.tsv sample / fs as shown in this work.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004789.v3.1.0
The analyzed source was OpenNeuro ds004789, version 3.1.0 (RAM FR1); the archived provenance records the source URLs and hashes of the bytes read.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsDetected hippocampal 10–60 Hz events were associated with lower word recall in 50 patients, but the effect varied across detectors
Same question and dataset with a different detector (Janca-type 10-60 Hz envelope, k = 3.65) and 65 subjects. We found the same direction and size (-4.3 points, Holm p = 0.0009, n = 50), and -5.6 points (p = 0.0009) in 28 subjects that e659d148 did not use. Its 29 subjects are also in our sample, so the full test is not independent. Its pre-word null agrees with our results at k = 3.0 and 5.0, but not at k = 3.65 (-3.2 points, p = 0.023, descriptive).
- supportsIn 87 catFR1 patients, hippocampal IED detections marked words with lower later recall
Same direction of the encoding-IED recall decrease, here in a different task.
- supportsWord-locked hippocampal IEDs were associated with lower recall in an expanded sample, but the preregistered test was inconclusive
Our word-locked estimate (-4.1 points pre-registered, -5.2 points in all 43 patients) is similar to its -4.4-point decrease for encoding IED words.
- supportsA pre-registered catFR1 replication found no significant recall decrease after hippocampal IED detections
Its non-significant FR1 trend agrees in sign with our non-significant catFR1 result.