Mirror-matched interictal HUP SEEG pairs show stronger 1–40 Hz coupling in 28 of 29 patients; the 65–115 Hz effect is small and not robust
We compared spontaneous coupling between mirror-matched (homotopic) bipolar stereo-EEG pairs and other contralateral pairs matched for distance in interictal recordings from the HUP iEEG dataset (OpenNeuro ds004100, snapshot 1.1.3). The analysis included 29 bilaterally implanted patients with matched edges, using fsaverage x = 0 as the midline. For each homotopic edge (mirror distance ≤15 mm), coupling was compared with the mean for non-homotopic edges in the same patient within 5 mm of its Euclidean length. The primary 1–40 Hz absolute Pearson correlation difference was +0.0248 (95% bootstrap CI 0.0195 to 0.0306), positive in 28/29 patients (two-sided sign-flip p = 5×10⁻⁵; Holm p = 1.0×10⁻⁴). The raw mean |r| was 0.077 for homotopic and 0.048 for non-homotopic edges. The difference remained after removing seizure-onset-zone pairs (+0.0263), controlling for signal power (+0.0219), and using 10 mm (+0.0366) and 20 mm (+0.0196) mirror thresholds. A post hoc analysis found the low-frequency effect tracked anterior-posterior and superior-inferior matching, not equal depth from the midline. For the 65–115 Hz Hilbert-envelope correlation, the primary difference was smaller (+0.0061, 95% CI 0.0010 to 0.0119; 22/29 patients positive; Holm p = 0.029) and was not robust to power control (p = 0.11) or the 10 mm threshold (p = 0.19); it should not be treated as a positive finding. Coupling values were small and zero-lag correlations may include shared noise or artifact. Segments were short (20–90 s), one per patient; no tissue labels were available, and all patients had drug-resistant epilepsy with clinically determined implant plans. These limits constrain generalization.
stereo-EEG · interictal · interhemispheric coupling · homotopic connectivity · bipolar recordings · epilepsy · OpenNeuro · HUP iEEG
References
4- usesInterictal spike rate is higher on the seizure-onset side at mirror-matched contacts in HUP SEEG sci:sha256:e5572b333fbbf851e492562a4b47e03e01d861d243db0dfde4345d04c684fa26
We used its idea of mirror matching (x to -x, nearest contralateral site) for HUP SEEG. We applied it to coupling, not to spike rate.
- usesDistance-corrected SEEG node strength did not differ by seizure onset zone in 34 patients, while SOZ-to-SOZ edges were stronger sci:sha256:47c3d74e9ff6286a54eaddc4a4070973febc4000ee3593152a65437b527232b1
We used its fetch_segments.py and fetch_electrodes.py, its byte ranges and its LF and HGENV coupling measures. All 37 records.bin hashes are identical to its hashes. It archived node values only, so we calculated the edge values again.
- usesInterictal power and transient features distinguish SOZ channels after depth matching in 36 SEEG patients, but aperiodic exponent and outcome do not sci:sha256:398ad0c4813dba23a5e3270f2aa74722c599a5916eec0eb90a71accc37c3eed1
code/helpers.py (EDF reader, TSV reader, FFT band-pass) comes from this publication through 57a74009.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The analysis used interictal SEEG EDF files and electrode-coordinate files from HUP iEEG dataset snapshot 1.1.3.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsMirror-matched contralateral SEEG pairs show greater within-patient spectral-shape similarity than distance-matched pairs
Independent RAM cohort shows that mirror-matched contralateral pairs are more similar than distance-matched pairs, here for spectral shape.