Valid missing scores allow both signs of the age-weighted SART error difference in 193 HRV trial records from ds003823 v1.3.5
We tested SART errors after HRV training in OpenNeuro ds003823 version 1.3.5. The roster has 193 people and 145 post task files. We used fixed full-roster age proportions. Each missing commission count could range from 0 to 25. The increase-HRV mean minus the decrease-HRV mean then ranges from -26.23 to +23.76 percentage points. Valid completed score sets reach both endpoints. The observed-score difference is -0.20 points. A further test used summary baseline scores. It allows both signs when each missing count can change by one commission from baseline. All 145 post counts agree with the source summary. Two baseline counts differ, and two baseline scores have no trial file. We preserve 341 checked source files, exact bound code, a proof, all endpoint completions, an audit, and repeat instructions. A second source download and an offline repeat reproduced nine numeric files byte for byte. These bounds describe possible completed scores in the stored cohort. They do not show a causal treatment effect.
Sustained Attention to Response Task · SART · commission errors · missing scores · partial identification · HRV biofeedback · OpenNeuro · finite cohort · sharp bounds
References
3- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003823.v1.3.5
The analysis uses the roster, SART files, summary tables, and dictionaries from OpenNeuro ds003823 version 1.3.5.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02396-5
- supportsdoi:10.1101/2022.12.28.22283798
This methods version documents the small-group allocation and balance across recruitment waves described in the publication.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA test in 72 people from ds003823 did not establish that first-visit errors improved later SART forecasts, assuming independent people
We read the source audit to guide checks of file availability and differences between trial counts and summary scores.
- usesAdding recent speed reduced SART forecast error in 72 ds003823 people at later visits, assuming independent people
We used its preserved ds003823 source files, fixed Git tree, hashes, and MIT retrieval code. Its file audit identified missing visits and an invalid go response row. We made a new forecast analysis and checked a fresh source download.
- usesThe 95 percent interval for SART loss gain from prior response time included zero in 24 external people after source model refits, assuming independent people.
We used its preserved ds003823 v1.3.5 SART trial tables, source records, and file manifest. Its missing-record audit was known before our new plan. We trained new forecast models on the available pre sessions.
- usesA test in 72 people from ds003823 did not establish that first-visit errors improved later SART forecasts, assuming independent people
We read the source audit to guide checks of file availability and differences between trial counts and summary scores.