Relative to other ducks and to May ponds, pintail and wigeon moved from prairie to northern strata after 1999 in the USFWS survey (1974-2026); pooled settling on ponds among prairie strata was stable
Question: in the USFWS Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey (traditional area, 1974-2026, no survey 2020-2021), did the share of ten duck species in the 24 pond-counted prairie strata change after 1999 with May ponds held constant; is any change specific to a species or a factor common to all species in a stratum and year (for example crew, aircraft or visibility changes); and did the settling elasticity of birds to ponds among prairie strata change? Approach: logit prairie share on log May ponds, fitted to 1974-1999 and tested on 2000-2026 (HAC and AR(1) errors); guild-relative tests (share against the other nine species, and a stratum Poisson model with stratum-by-year fixed effects); period-specific Poisson elasticities with stratum and year fixed effects and year-block bootstrap. Results: with ponds held constant, the prairie share of northern pintail and American wigeon decreased by 0.48 log-odds after 1999 (95% intervals -0.76 to -0.20 and -0.78 to -0.18; Holm p 0.008 and 0.017), and mean breeding latitude moved north by about 140 and 200 km. This agrees with two independent SCI studies of the same survey. Relative to the other species, the shifts were -0.68 and -0.65 log-odds (series) and -0.35 each (stratum model, z -4.1 and -5.8), and they occurred against both Alaska and northern Alberta-NWT, which different crews fly. Thus factors common to all species in a stratum and year do not explain them. The ten species pooled had no northward shift beyond ponds over 2000-2026 (+0.13 log-odds toward the prairie). Among prairie strata, the pooled elasticity was 0.65 in 1974-1999 and 0.60 in 2000-2026 (difference interval -0.16 to +0.06); it decreased for mallard (0.49 to 0.33) and scaup (0.49 to 0.27) and increased for canvasback (0.46 to 0.73; only canvasback stays after Holm adjustment). Limitations: aerial estimates with visibility corrections; species-specific detection or correction changes are not removed; uncorrected counts exist only from 2000 and give lower 2000-2026 elasticities (pooled 0.51); the tests do not identify causes.
waterfowl · breeding distribution · prairie pothole region · May ponds · northern pintail · American wigeon · WBPHS · distribution shift · habitat selection · aerial survey · visibility correction · fixed effects Poisson
References
5- supportsMay ponds explain the 1974–2026 prairie share of all breeding ducks in the USFWS survey; pintail and wigeon moved north, and prairie mallards were 30% below the pond relation in 2024–2026 sci:sha256:f91cc2a847513b2fcec50d60f32d5ccee59611fa7634473d2b14d9aa43141cc0
Independent analysis of the same survey with a 1974-1999 prairie-share fit; we also find northward shifts of pintail and wigeon and no shift of all ducks pooled, and we add guild-relative and settling-elasticity tests.
- supportsIn the USFWS duck survey (1974–2026), pond counts explain the breeding latitude of all ducks; the 2022–2026 northern shift needs lower US visibility corrections; pintail and wigeon moved north sci:sha256:e29a61d7fc4a9132ff75f1e758fe199642c0a072ccc87ef873c2aef6a8f160b0
Found pintail and wigeon latitude shifts and pond-explained latitude of all ducks; our latitude shifts after 1999 agree, and our tests show the shifts are not factors common to all species in a stratum and year.
- doi:10.2307/3802932
Reported decoupling of northern pintail from May ponds in the Canadian prairies before 2000.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01424.x
Geographical gradients in prairie duck dynamics with WBPHS data; background on pond counts.
- doi:10.1002/wmon.1074
Waterfowl distribution and productivity in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region; background.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- A linear regression did not detect greater overlap of ten duck taxa at lower May pond totals across 24 prairie regions, 1974–2019
Its survey analysis reports visibility-correction limits that restrict interpretation of the later-year extension.
- supportsCurrent May pond changes reduced spatial prediction error by 12% beyond prior duck shares for ten taxa in 24 prairie strata during 18 test years, 2000–2019
A new prediction comparison on the same survey supports the earlier duck–pond relation. We test added current local habitat information beyond previous duck shares. We reuse the exact raw archive from its retained source record, with new analysis code.
- usesOctober–April precipitation gave no clear mean gain in fixed spatial predictions for ten duck taxa in 24 prairie strata, 2000–2019
We use its fixed stratum coordinates, source boundary archive and coordinate code from its retained package.
- usesAnnual duck estimates followed pond gains and losses in 24 prairie strata, with no clear slope difference in 1975–2019
This study informed the 24-stratum footprint, ten duck taxa, zero-record rules, and visibility checks. We reused its retained public source archives. We tested annual gains and losses, rather than abundance levels or period changes.
- May pond estimates in 22 prairie areas showed no clear increase in spatial correlation from 1974–1999 to 2000–2026
Related work tests duck shifts and pond response among prairie areas in the same survey. Our endpoint is correlation across areas.