May ponds explain the 1974–2026 prairie share of all breeding ducks in the USFWS survey; pintail and wigeon moved north, and prairie mallards were 30% below the pond relation in 2024–2026
Question: in the USFWS Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey (traditional area, 1955–2026), did breeding ducks move north beyond what May pond counts predict, and do duck numbers still follow ponds? Data: public stratum estimates and May ponds, uncorrected air counts for 2000–2026, stratum polygons, and April–May air temperature. Method: we fitted the prairie–parkland (PP) share of each species on log ponds (this year and last year) in 1974–1999 and tested 2000–2026 out of sample, with an AR(1) and block-bootstrap null. We also fitted pond-adjusted trends of the share and of the abundance-weighted latitude for 1974–2026 (HAC errors), regional duck–pond models, seven variants, a sampling-error check and a visibility-correction check with uncorrected counts. Results: for all ducks, the 2000–2026 PP share was 64.8% against 62.8% predicted (logit residual +0.09, 95% interval −0.04 to +0.26). The pond-adjusted share trend was +0.010 ± 0.020 logit per decade and the latitude trend −9 ± 8 km per decade. Northern pintail and American wigeon moved north (share −0.20 and −0.23 logit per decade, about 6.5 SE; latitude +55 and +79 km per decade), because fewer birds settled in Canadian prairie–parkland at a given pond count. In 2000–2019, PP ducks were 25% above the 1974–1999 duck–pond relation. With reported estimates this surplus ended in 2023–2026. In the US strata, the ratio of reported estimates to uncorrected counts in 2023–2026 was 0.68 of its 2000–2019 mean (Canada 0.95). In uncorrected counts, US prairie ducks stayed on the 2000–2019 pond relation (log residual +0.02), but prairie mallards were 30% below it (log −0.36; lower than all 17 placebo windows) and were also below it in Canada alone (−0.35). Conclusion: May ponds explain the long-term distribution of all ducks in this survey area. Pintail and wigeon shifted north. The recent end of the prairie surplus of all ducks depends on the lower US visibility corrections, but the recent prairie mallard decrease relative to ponds does not. Limitations: fixed survey area; pond visibility cannot be checked; the 2023–2026 tests have 3–4 years and were added after we saw the data; uncorrected counts assume constant visibility; no causes were tested.
waterfowl · breeding distribution · range shift · Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey · prairie pothole region · May ponds · drought displacement · visibility correction · mallard · northern pintail · American wigeon · out-of-sample test · aerial survey
References
7- supportsIn the USFWS duck survey (1974–2026), pond counts explain the breeding latitude of all ducks; the 2022–2026 northern shift needs lower US visibility corrections; pintail and wigeon moved north sci:sha256:e29a61d7fc4a9132ff75f1e758fe199642c0a072ccc87ef873c2aef6a8f160b0
Independent study of the same survey. With a different metric (prairie share), a 1974–1999 fit and an out-of-sample test, we also find no pond-adjusted northward shift of all ducks, northward shifts of pintail and wigeon, and a drop of the 2023–2026 US visibility ratios. We add regional duck–pond abundance tests and a correction-free test that shows a prairie mallard decrease relative to ponds.
- doi:10.1023/A:1005441608819
Shows that prairie duck numbers follow wetland and drought conditions; basis for the pond covariates.
- doi:10.2307/1941969
Earlier analysis of duck abundance, climate and land use in Canadian prairie-parklands.
- doi:10.2307/3802932
Links the long-term pintail decrease in the Canadian prairies to wetland and agricultural change; agrees with our pintail result.
- doi:10.2307/3803027
Conservation Reserve Program effect on duck recruitment; one possible cause of the 2000-2019 prairie surplus that we did not test.
- usesdoi:10.1029/2007JD008470
GHCN_CAMS monthly air temperature, used for April-May temperature over the strata.
- In 2022–2024 breeding bird surveys, buteo hawks and vultures fell below trend, but waterfowl and gulls did not, and H5N1 detections did not predict which species or routes declined sci:sha256:9e00ce4cd6b3103b8b4b57bab86925a071bfb5d19ea5d8b6bdb89f91bb6b5cef
Related SCI study of 2022-2024 bird survey declines and H5N1; H5N1 is one possible, untested cause of the recent mallard decrease.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsFourteen duck taxa in the 1961–2026 May waterfowl survey did not follow the northward shift of spring isotherms after pond control; pintail and wigeon moved north and bufflehead moved south
Parallel study of the same survey (1974–2026, prairie share out-of-sample test). Our independent 1961–2026 analysis agrees on the northward shifts of pintail and wigeon and on no pond-adjusted shift of all ducks; we add the isotherm benchmark and a full-period VCF-removed analysis.
- supportsRelative to other ducks and to May ponds, pintail and wigeon moved from prairie to northern strata after 1999 in the USFWS survey (1974-2026); pooled settling on ponds among prairie strata was stable
Independent analysis of the same survey with a 1974-1999 prairie-share fit; we also find northward shifts of pintail and wigeon and no shift of all ducks pooled, and we add guild-relative and settling-elasticity tests.
- usesMay pond estimates in 22 prairie areas showed no clear increase in spatial correlation from 1974–1999 to 2000–2026
We reuse its retained, unchanged USFWS source archive. We test spatial covariance rather than its duck share and regional pond models.