Reverse excitation change gave no clear prediction gain for 30 Hz inhibitory change in 60 mouse V1 pairs with separate test mice and trial halves
We tested whether reverse response change helps predict inhibitory voltage change at 30 Hz. We used 60 reciprocal PV–pyramidal pairs from 25 mice in released mouse V1 data. Each test mouse was absent from fitting. Disjoint trial halves supplied predictors and targets, with full-data source annotations held fixed. A fixed linear model controlled for both first responses and soma distance. Adding excitatory change raised equal-mouse mean squared error from 0.0392725 to 0.0401855. Error reduction was -2.32%, with a central 95% whole-mouse refit range of -8.70% to +2.94%. The connection’s own separate-trial inhibitory change also gave no clear gain. An added precision check found first-response feature repeat correlations of 0.960 for excitation and 0.935 for inhibition. Change correlations were 0.399 and 0.027. This result limits the tested prediction rule. Weak change precision prevents an inference that true dynamics are independent. The recordings are selected slice connections, not a complete connectome. We reproduced the compact inputs from all 628 raw source records. The package preserves code, derived data, provenance, model states, all results, figures and repeat instructions.
reciprocal connectivity · short-term synaptic dynamics · parvalbumin · visual cortex · voltage response · trial split · prediction · measurement precision
References
6- usesAt 30 Hz, local voltage products fell while total peak products had no clear fall in 60 reciprocal PV–pyramidal pairs from mouse V1 sci:sha256:5ba5c09c4a6370540c4627321cfba91b90159cda0922751922dc9599c43af49a
We reuse verified trial scalars, a fixed 60-pair subset, and MIT source extraction and retrieval code. We test a new prediction rule.
- Recording and cell class controls left no clear added agreement in initial 50 Hz responses of 144 mouse reciprocal pairs sci:sha256:68f047b73392ee440a4b219b558a0865646d318aefb1f1a5714bfcad248cb881
That independent Allen dataset test found no clear added dynamic agreement under its controls. Our different V1 prediction test also gives no clear gain. Neither test proves absent coordination.
- usesdoi:10.25418/crick.23295188.v1
This exact data release supplies the raw paired recordings and annotations.
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.12.013
This source study supplies the biological measurements and response method. It already reports reciprocal strength matching.
- doi:10.1152/jn.00283.2003
This earlier study reports matching reciprocal dynamics in a different cortical system and with a different response measure.
- doi:10.1038/1092
This earlier study establishes target class dependence of repeated synaptic responses.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesFixed voltage windows gave no clear correlation increase after spikes in 35 mouse V1 inhibitory output pairs
The source retrieval script comes through the prior exposure study from this publication. Its MIT notice is retained.
- usesVisual similarity gave no clear gain in fixed ridge predictions of second responses at 30 Hz for 44 mouse V1 inhibitory links
We reuse its MIT pulse extraction script through the checked SCI pulse benchmark. The retained license records this origin.
- usesTrial adjustment reduced a 30 Hz map score from 1.53% to 0.83% in 76 selected mouse V1 PV outputs
We verify and reuse its compact amplitude tables and MIT extraction and retrieval scripts. We add shared exposure identities and within-PV map tests.