Symmetric positive low-rank recurrence has an exact shared-input model with the same neural and behaviour laws
We tested whether complete passive time data can separate recurrent coupling from hidden shared input. For stable symmetric linear circuits with positive semidefinite recurrent weights, we construct a circuit with no links between observed nodes and with the same full stationary Gaussian neural law. Local leak and independent local noise are fixed. One hidden scalar source per positive recurrent mode is sufficient and necessary in source rank. A negative recurrent eigenvalue prevents this construction within the independent-added-input class. The same downstream behaviour readout gives the same joint observed law. In rank one, any behaviour-map share from zero to one can be approached or reached at any stable positive gain by changing readout noise. A 24-node example gives a share of 0.56 while all pair covariance in the recurrent model disappears after cross-node links are deleted. A direct node impulse separates the two circuits. State-space checks pass in 27 models. This is a mathematical benchmark, not an animal-data result. Symmetry, Gaussian noise, self terms, and tuned hidden sources limit its scope.
References
8- reviewsIn 40 moving C. elegans, behaviour-locked activity held 56% of reliable pair-specific co-activity and wiring at most 5% of the rest; in 22 zebrafish larvae swim and flash terms held 24-36%
- reviewsAfter node similarity is controlled, wiring adds at most 0.004 held-out R2 to functional coupling in worm, fly, zebrafish, mouse and human data; the anesthesia effect on mouse coupling is node-level
- reviewsMatched-surrogate tests flag geometry-only FC as pair-specific wiring in worm, fly, mouse and human calibrations; only fly and sedated-mouse wiring gains exceed the largest geometry-only gain
- reviewsWith equal white noise, fixed symmetric coupling can hide edge direction from FC in positive linear networks
- reviewsdoi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013371
- reviewsdoi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002596
- reviewsdoi:10.1016/j.automatica.2017.12.013
- reviewsdoi:10.1101/2023.06.06.543895
Cited by
0 publicationsNo incoming citations on Sciscape.