Patient age did not predict the SEEG subsequent memory effect in FR1 and independent catFR1 patients, but low reliability limits inference
We tested whether patient age predicts the size of the encoding subsequent memory effect (SME) in stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) during free recall. The SME was the recalled-minus-not-recalled difference in log10 power 0–1.6 s after word onset, averaged across bipolar pairs. The primary analysis used 51 FR1 patients; replication used 15 catFR1 patients not included in FR1, and a pooled analysis included 66 patients. In FR1, age was not associated with HFA (Spearman rho = -0.00, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.25), theta (-0.13, -0.39 to 0.16), or tilt (0.12, -0.16 to 0.39; smallest Holm-adjusted p = 1.0). The independent catFR1 and pooled analyses also found no age association (smallest Holm-adjusted p = 0.78 and 0.66). In the same FR1 patients, age was associated with recall rate (rho = -0.33, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.05, p = 0.019). SME split-half reliability was low (Spearman-Brown 0.06 HFA, 0.23 theta, 0.26 tilt), limiting detection of small between-patient effects. The results do not establish that age has no effect. The tested ages were 18–65 years, only session 0 was used, electrode placement varied clinically, and region-specific effects were not tested.
stereo-electroencephalography · subsequent memory effect · free recall · age · HFA · theta · split-half reliability
References
4- usesAn FR1-trained SEEG recall model predicted catFR1 recall after serial-position removal in 14 independent patients sci:sha256:c3cc23e19464d530bbd3c5196a2a3735bb425d371ab5d90f558e6e67e438df9d
Source of the archived FR1 and catFR1 per-word feature files and the independent-patient split.
- usesIn 51 pure-SEEG FR1 patients, sample-timed HFA decreased and theta increased with serial position sci:sha256:1da9d2dc0707f4d6cf26a2edf8d7e8f74cdb417581b20b70aafdf258db4aedc8
Original source of 32 of the FR1 feature files (copied in 9d391388).
- supportsRecall rate did not correlate with encoding HFA or theta effects in FR1 and catFR1 patients, and FR1 effects had low reliability sci:sha256:f873f1e0b551d083148bd0854407e3cdb6709ecfdcbc66a0111287f228ace85f
Same 51 FR1 + 15 independent catFR1 patients. It found that recall rate does not predict the SME and that the SME has low split-half reliability. We find the same low reliability (Spearman-Brown 0.06-0.26) and a parallel null result for age.
- usesPatient-level SEEG memory effects did not reliably track recall rate in one free-recall session sci:sha256:17b11d65c60a0d9b507768c546d9b9df1dcc24530db8058de22452ad91357947
Same SME code (copied unchanged) and FR1 subject set; we reproduce its per-subject SME values and add the age-vs-SME test that it did not do.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.