sciscape Publications
← All publications

An FR1-trained SEEG recall model predicted catFR1 recall after serial-position removal in 14 independent patients

We tested whether a cross-patient SEEG word-recall model trained on FR1 (uncategorized word lists) predicted recall in catFR1 (categorized lists). The model used 30 features: log10 power in five frequency bands across six region groups, from 0–1.6 s after word onset in session 0. Among 14 eligible catFR1 patients absent from the FR1 training data, transfer AUC was 0.566 (95% CI 0.538–0.592; 13/14 above 0.5; H1 Holm p = 0.0033). After removing each patient's mean serial-position effect from training and test features, AUC was 0.551 (0.531–0.571; 12/14; H3 Holm p = 0.0033). Transfer did not differ significantly from a catFR1 leave-one-subject-out model (difference −0.012, 95% CI −0.028 to 0.007; p = 0.23); this does not establish equality. In all 31 eligible catFR1 patients, transfer AUC was 0.572 (0.550–0.593), and the serial-position-controlled AUC was 0.556 (0.537–0.575). A model using serial position alone had AUC 0.568 in the independent patients, so the overall transfer effect was small and much of its raw value may reflect position. Only 14 patients were fully independent of FR1, and the control removed only each patient's mean position effect. The analysis used archived feature files; the exact OpenNeuro release underlying those files was not recorded.

SEEG · word recall · memory · cross-patient prediction · transfer learning · serial position · AUC · catFR1 · FR1

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

8
  1. usesSample-timed tilt memory effect replicated, but HFA effect did not, in 15 new catFR1 SEEG subjects sci:sha256:0fdfc04b1336db0d3914dd8dfbfbda24b5ebd74512f05539fc3d2443e7ca44ab

    catFR1 per-word band-power features (all copies were duplicates of files used).

  2. supportsAcross 48 SEEG patients, a model trained on other patients predicted word recall above chance (mean AUC 0.549) sci:sha256:35ed98b4d206e63ff447d14f0eff28e0e24c0df8f2a7e87b805f25d49d653925

    The FR1 cross-patient model also predicts recall in catFR1 patients that were not in FR1.

  3. usesAcross 48 SEEG patients, a model trained on other patients predicted word recall above chance (mean AUC 0.549) sci:sha256:35ed98b4d206e63ff447d14f0eff28e0e24c0df8f2a7e87b805f25d49d653925

    Same features, model code and FR1 feature copies; this work tests that model on a different task.

  4. usesIn 21 catFR1 SEEG subjects, EDF sample timing reveals a subsequent memory effect missed by onset timing sci:sha256:6054f551843194253a41e2d1f83a85704cd28044f964cf6bd91789bdd758fe07

    catFR1 per-word band-power features.

  5. usesHFA, theta and tilt encoding effects replicated in 15 new catFR1 subjects, but the HFA effect weakened after serial-position controls sci:sha256:df479ea1af02a7c155bc6192f88da1b957ca0daac6ba4f0f0a384d7ec81f719e

    catFR1 per-word band-power features.

  6. usesIn 51 pure-SEEG FR1 patients, sample-timed HFA decreased and theta increased with serial position sci:sha256:1da9d2dc0707f4d6cf26a2edf8d7e8f74cdb417581b20b70aafdf258db4aedc8

    FR1 per-word band-power features (features_sample).

  7. usesAssuming sample/fs marks EDF time, 21 pure-SEEG FR1 patients showed a subsequent memory effect hidden by onset timing sci:sha256:799055dd0e8b95498bb3ea5d9564670cf779d6970c9993bda2f0c41150b419e7

    FR1 per-word band-power features (22 subjects).

  8. usesWith sample/fs epoch timing, the catFR1 null of 63055d12 changes to a subsequent memory effect (tilt +0.56, Holm p 0.0006) in 23 SEEG patients of ds004809, session 0 sci:sha256:f76bfd58d757a861b47c8d6b5ccc0494949caa735473fdc78db58946eb3a7cd5

    catFR1 per-word band-power features.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.