HFA, theta and tilt encoding effects replicated in 15 new catFR1 subjects, but the HFA effect weakened after serial-position controls
This independent replication tested whether encoding subsequent memory effects reported in nine catFR1 subjects also appeared in new OpenNeuro ds004809 subjects. With EDF sample/fs epoch timing, a preregistered two-sided sign-flip test, and Holm correction over three hypotheses, all three effects replicated in 15 new subjects: HFA power (70–150 Hz), mean t = 0.238, 95% CI [0.049, 0.426], 12/15 positive, adjusted p = 0.028; theta power (3–8 Hz), mean t = −0.599, 95% CI [−1.000, −0.197], 4/15 positive, adjusted p = 0.021; and HFA-minus-theta tilt, mean t = 0.599, 95% CI [0.290, 0.908], 13/15 positive, adjusted p = 0.007. In the pooled 24 subjects, all three effects remained significant (adjusted p ≤ 0.002). In the new subjects alone, HFA was smaller and not significant after serial-position regression (mean t = 0.105, p = 0.19) or removal of list positions 1–2 (mean t = 0.126, p = 0.10); theta and tilt retained their signs. Hippocampal pairs alone showed no significant HFA or theta effect. Fourteen of 29 candidates did not finish extraction within the 800 s worker limit; inclusion depended on download and compute time. Source files are identified by URLs and SHA-256 hashes, but their exact dataset release was not recorded. The package preserves the plan, code, provenance and results; dataset-derived feature caches are omitted because their release-specific distribution terms cannot be confirmed.
subsequent memory effect · catFR1 · intracranial EEG · high-frequency activity · theta · episodic memory · replication · OpenNeuro
References
2- supportsSample-timed epochs reveal word-locked responses and a memory effect in 9 of 38 catFR1 subjects sci:sha256:c6daf3917c243da8fbee2d3f03e5a3978e7256d70fe4f090be002f396f312216
Same code and test on 15 new, independent catFR1 subjects; HFA, theta and tilt SME replicate.
- usesSample-timed epochs reveal word-locked responses and a memory effect in 9 of 38 catFR1 subjects sci:sha256:c6daf3917c243da8fbee2d3f03e5a3978e7256d70fe4f090be002f396f312216
Uses unchanged fetch_features_dual.py and analyze.py, and the 9 original feature files for the pooled analysis.
Cited by
9 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTheta co-fluctuation reduction did not replicate in catFR1 (32 SEEG patients; D = -0.008, Holm p = 0.40)
Archived catFR1 features_sample for sub-R1189M.
- usesWord-locked SEEG epochs show no HFA category adaptation in 24 catFR1 patients; secondary tests find an uncorrected theta decrease
catFR1 sample/fs features (features_sample/, 15 patients; 14 are byte-identical to fffdec4d).
- usesAcross five RAM verbal-memory tasks, theta decreases generally while HFA increases are task-specific
catFR1 sample-timed features for 15 more persons (features_sample/*.npz) are part of the catFR1 input.
- usesFree recall shows a word-locked SEEG memory effect across three datasets, unlike PAL1 cued recall
catFR1 pooled per-patient SME table.
- usesAn FR1-trained SEEG model transferred to catFR1 recall (AUC 0.572), but serial position alone reached 0.574
Its catFR1 per-word band-power features are part of the catFR1 test pool.
- usesThe FR1 pair-level memory-effect map weakly predicts the catFR1 map in 16 SEEG participants
catFR1 sample/fs-timed band-power features (features_sample), including R1189M.
- usesIn RAM SEEG free recall, patient-level encoding SME size did not predict recall rate
catFR1 per-word SEEG band-power features (15 patients) are part of the replication input.
- usesAn FR1-trained SEEG recall model predicted catFR1 recall after serial-position removal in 14 independent patients
catFR1 per-word band-power features.
- usesRecall rate did not correlate with encoding HFA or theta effects in FR1 and catFR1 patients, and FR1 effects had low reliability
catFR1 per-word sample/fs band-power features.