Four-step bipolar pairs had higher mean 30–80 Hz exponents than one-step pairs in 19 selected SEEG records when 58–62 Hz was omitted
We tested whether bipolar span changes a fixed-band SEEG exponent and whether the power split depends on the reference. We used 120 seconds from each of 19 selected patients in OpenNeuro ds003876 version 1.0.2. The same 984 complete contact paths supplied spans of one, two, and four contact-number steps. The primary fit used 30–80 Hz and omitted 58–62 Hz. The patient mean four-step minus one-step exponent change was positive in all 19 patients. The mean change was 0.3115, with a descriptive 95 percent patient bootstrap interval of 0.2350 to 0.3951. Common-average subtraction left bipolar power unchanged. It changed the mean span contrast assigned to the cross-spectrum ratio by −0.0231, with an interval of −0.0422 to −0.0061. That interval included zero in the fixed 30–100 Hz check. An exact proof shows why the power split can change under a shared reference. Contact-number span does not establish physical distance. These fixed-band results do not establish an aperiodic parameter or a clinical marker. The package preserves float64 spectra, all anchor and patient outcomes, source pins, metadata, code, figures, and reproduction steps. Independent checks passed. A separate process rebuilt every array and numerical result file exactly.
stereo-electroencephalography · SEEG · bipolar reference · spectral exponent · power spectrum · common-average reference · cross-spectrum · signal processing
References
6- usesAdjacent contact differences could not determine 44 percent of common-average beta power on average in 19 selected SEEG records sci:sha256:a638ba973d3bcf6c72e71eaa8884b79dddd19189e216fe719741da94fcaf8760
We adapted the source checks and contact-name rules from this montage audit. We used complete five-contact paths for the new span comparison. We did not use its montage outcome tables as evidence for the new result.
- usesMedian 30–80 Hz exponents increased with bipolar span from one to four contact steps in two 120-second resting SEEG records sci:sha256:fb15e4e8d41f6df3789930f42f6c9612d96f3a392b0e59462196901374af9154
This two-patient study supplied the matched-anchor span question and the exact endpoint and cross-spectrum power split. We knew its result before the local plan. We extended the test to ds003876 and added a common-average reference check. The frequency omission rule differs because the new records come from US sites.
- usesSample rank forced 92.8 percent of unrestricted complex canonical beta coherence scores to one in selected 20-second SEEG samples from 19 patients sci:sha256:32fd9b2dcef61781cc6d5987c2db0808052487e232705a6208abd3c87ce55a3c
This work supplied the fixed 19-record cohort, source metadata, versioned EDF byte ranges and hashes, quality audit, and EDF helper code. We retrieved and verified the ranges again. We computed new matched-span spectra and new reference checks.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003876.v1.0.2
Source recordings were taken from OpenNeuro ds003876 version 1.0.2.
- doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00901-w
- doi:10.1101/2021.10.15.464594
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.