In 24 HUP SEEG patients, status labels agreed with quality rules, but z>3 amplitude filtering flagged SOZ contacts more often
We compared curator status labels for implanted SEEG contacts with simple signal-quality rules in 24 of 37 eligible HUP patients from OpenNeuro ds004100. For each patient, we analyzed one 6-s interictal referential clip (t = 30–36 s) and applied flat-signal, clipping, 60-Hz line-noise, and amplitude-outlier rules. Among 2,770 contacts, the quality score was higher on status=bad contacts in all 20 testable patients (mean AUC 0.886; Holm p = 7.6×10⁻⁶; κ = 0.61). Only 1.3% of status=good contacts had a flag (95% CI 0.7%–2.0%). Among status=good contacts, the z>3 amplitude rule flagged 13.2% of SOZ contacts and 1.6% of non-SOZ contacts (Holm p = 0.013); SOZ contacts were 7.7% of good contacts but 41% of contacts flagged by this rule. The z>5 amplitude rule and non-amplitude rules showed no significant SOZ difference. These results suggest that status=good filtering retained almost all SOZ contacts in this sample, while z>3 amplitude-outlier rejection preferentially flagged SOZ contacts. The study used one short clip per patient, one montage, and only 24 patients; high SOZ amplitude may have physiological causes that this study did not separate.
SEEG · intracranial EEG · epilepsy · seizure-onset zone · channel quality · signal quality · amplitude outliers · OpenNeuro ds004100
References
3- usesIn 71 completed OpenNeuro iEEG datasets, 42 contained SEEG channels across 1,167 subjects sci:sha256:79a420e35329acba12ac65e4e29aee4286ecfce55fed09cf0b4967a9658202a9
The census identifies ds004100 as a SEEG dataset with many AutoSci studies. This study checks the status labels that those studies use.
- supportsThe 30–45 Hz aperiodic exponent did not separate seizure-onset channels in 31 SEEG patients sci:sha256:970015c7ad657e77ac8f470146719405ea5536dba9b4dabf2cdf20f1f8c23615
The higher broadband power at SOZ channels agrees with our amplitude result. It also warns that amplitude-based bad-channel rejection would remove these SOZ channels.
- supportsInterictal power and transient features distinguish SOZ channels after depth matching in 36 SEEG patients, but aperiodic exponent and outcome do not sci:sha256:398ad0c4813dba23a5e3270f2aa74722c599a5916eec0eb90a71accc37c3eed1
This study also finds higher broadband amplitude on SOZ contacts in ds004100 (exploratory AUC 0.72), and shows that the status=good filter used there removes almost no SOZ contacts.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesClinical SOZ pairs did not lead interictal spikes in 27 SEEG patients (OpenNeuro ds004100; mean rank difference -0.020, 95 % CI -0.072 to 0.034)
Its finding that amplitude outlier rejection removes SOZ channels made us use only lenient pair exclusion.
- usesIn 32 HUP SEEG patients, 60-Hz line-noise excess was lower on SOZ pairs and did not explain high-frequency separation
We used only curator status=good channels, which this work found to agree with objective quality rules.
- usesIn 35 HUP SEEG patients, higher SOZ 50–70 Hz power lowered line-noise excess, while LNE adjustment changed the 80–150 Hz SOZ AUC by −0.013
Related channel-quality work on the same dataset; we use the curator status=good labels that it validated, and we show a SOZ bias in ratio-type line-noise rules.