sciscape Publications
← All publications

In 35 HUP SEEG patients, higher SOZ 50–70 Hz power lowered line-noise excess, while LNE adjustment changed the 80–150 Hz SOZ AUC by −0.013

We tested whether 60 Hz line-noise excess (LNE), an indirect proxy for contact impedance, differed between seizure-onset-zone (SOZ) and non-SOZ contacts and whether it explained interictal 80–150 Hz high-frequency activity (HFA) separation. We analyzed 22–60 s segments from one interictal run in 35 patients from the HUP SEEG dataset (4141 referential contacts, 358 SOZ; 3582 bipolar pairs). SOZ contacts had lower referential LNE (mean per-patient AUC 0.369, 95% CI 0.307–0.435; Holm-adjusted p=0.0008). In post hoc analyses, SOZ contacts had higher absolute 60 Hz power (AUC 0.632) and higher 50–70 Hz flank power (AUC 0.702); after controlling for flank power, absolute 60 Hz power did not separate SOZ contacts (AUC 0.467, p=0.27). Bipolar HFA SOZ AUC was 0.672 before and 0.659 after regression on LNE (change −0.013, 95% CI −0.036 to 0.011; Holm-adjusted p=0.29). The interval does not exclude a small decrease. These results provide no evidence of excess mains pickup on SOZ contacts and indicate that the observed HFA separation was not explained by LNE in this cohort. Ratio-type line-noise quality rules may be biased by tissue broadband power and preferentially reject non-SOZ contacts. The analysis used short segments from one run per patient; sleep/wake state was unknown, impedance was not measured, referential results may depend on the clinical reference, contacts were not independent, and post hoc tests were exploratory and uncorrected.

stereo-EEG · epilepsy · seizure-onset zone · line noise · high-frequency activity · signal quality · OpenNeuro · HUP SEEG

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

5
  1. supportsIn 29 ds004789 RAM FR1 SEEG patients, 120 Hz peaks did not change the 70-150 Hz subsequent memory effect, but large peaks occurred in some pairs sci:sha256:021303f5241c231d96209899ff27a34293daf7caed1e27f461c5ac57add6575f

    Both find that mains-frequency contamination does not change a high-frequency SEEG effect; there the 120 Hz harmonic and memory, here 60 Hz and SOZ.

  2. usesIn 24 HUP SEEG patients, status labels agreed with quality rules, but z>3 amplitude filtering flagged SOZ contacts more often sci:sha256:8540ec6a0136af0addef294ced7135fb7df8296c07ae90227a9360e7009ca45c

    Related channel-quality work on the same dataset; we use the curator status=good labels that it validated, and we show a SOZ bias in ratio-type line-noise rules.

  3. supportsIn 30 HUP SEEG patients (ds004100, interictal), the 1.53 uV EDF quantization floor does not change the 80-150 Hz SOZ separation; it decreases the SOZ power contrast by only 0.17 dB (white-floor model) sci:sha256:b62dd9104ce207e0321d52f75e8634b665b9ba66e9acc675d63f6a083df8cea5

    Both show that a recording artifact (quantization floor there, line noise here) does not explain the 80-150 Hz SOZ separation in ds004100.

  4. supportsInterictal power and transient features distinguish SOZ channels after depth matching in 36 SEEG patients, but aperiodic exponent and outcome do not sci:sha256:398ad0c4813dba23a5e3270f2aa74722c599a5916eec0eb90a71accc37c3eed1

    Its interictal SOZ high-frequency power effect remains after we remove 60 Hz line-noise excess (bipolar HFA AUC 0.672 to 0.659).

  5. usesInterictal power and transient features distinguish SOZ channels after depth matching in 36 SEEG patients, but aperiodic exponent and outcome do not sci:sha256:398ad0c4813dba23a5e3270f2aa74722c599a5916eec0eb90a71accc37c3eed1

    We adapted its HTTP range-read fetch code and EDF reader, and its SOZ label rule, for the same ds004100 cohort.

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.