In 35 HUP SEEG patients, higher SOZ 50–70 Hz power lowered line-noise excess, while LNE adjustment changed the 80–150 Hz SOZ AUC by −0.013
We tested whether 60 Hz line-noise excess (LNE), an indirect proxy for contact impedance, differed between seizure-onset-zone (SOZ) and non-SOZ contacts and whether it explained interictal 80–150 Hz high-frequency activity (HFA) separation. We analyzed 22–60 s segments from one interictal run in 35 patients from the HUP SEEG dataset (4141 referential contacts, 358 SOZ; 3582 bipolar pairs). SOZ contacts had lower referential LNE (mean per-patient AUC 0.369, 95% CI 0.307–0.435; Holm-adjusted p=0.0008). In post hoc analyses, SOZ contacts had higher absolute 60 Hz power (AUC 0.632) and higher 50–70 Hz flank power (AUC 0.702); after controlling for flank power, absolute 60 Hz power did not separate SOZ contacts (AUC 0.467, p=0.27). Bipolar HFA SOZ AUC was 0.672 before and 0.659 after regression on LNE (change −0.013, 95% CI −0.036 to 0.011; Holm-adjusted p=0.29). The interval does not exclude a small decrease. These results provide no evidence of excess mains pickup on SOZ contacts and indicate that the observed HFA separation was not explained by LNE in this cohort. Ratio-type line-noise quality rules may be biased by tissue broadband power and preferentially reject non-SOZ contacts. The analysis used short segments from one run per patient; sleep/wake state was unknown, impedance was not measured, referential results may depend on the clinical reference, contacts were not independent, and post hoc tests were exploratory and uncorrected.
stereo-EEG · epilepsy · seizure-onset zone · line noise · high-frequency activity · signal quality · OpenNeuro · HUP SEEG
References
5- supportsIn 29 ds004789 RAM FR1 SEEG patients, 120 Hz peaks did not change the 70-150 Hz subsequent memory effect, but large peaks occurred in some pairs sci:sha256:021303f5241c231d96209899ff27a34293daf7caed1e27f461c5ac57add6575f
Both find that mains-frequency contamination does not change a high-frequency SEEG effect; there the 120 Hz harmonic and memory, here 60 Hz and SOZ.
- usesIn 24 HUP SEEG patients, status labels agreed with quality rules, but z>3 amplitude filtering flagged SOZ contacts more often sci:sha256:8540ec6a0136af0addef294ced7135fb7df8296c07ae90227a9360e7009ca45c
Related channel-quality work on the same dataset; we use the curator status=good labels that it validated, and we show a SOZ bias in ratio-type line-noise rules.
- supportsIn 30 HUP SEEG patients (ds004100, interictal), the 1.53 uV EDF quantization floor does not change the 80-150 Hz SOZ separation; it decreases the SOZ power contrast by only 0.17 dB (white-floor model) sci:sha256:b62dd9104ce207e0321d52f75e8634b665b9ba66e9acc675d63f6a083df8cea5
Both show that a recording artifact (quantization floor there, line noise here) does not explain the 80-150 Hz SOZ separation in ds004100.
- supportsInterictal power and transient features distinguish SOZ channels after depth matching in 36 SEEG patients, but aperiodic exponent and outcome do not sci:sha256:398ad0c4813dba23a5e3270f2aa74722c599a5916eec0eb90a71accc37c3eed1
Its interictal SOZ high-frequency power effect remains after we remove 60 Hz line-noise excess (bipolar HFA AUC 0.672 to 0.659).
- usesInterictal power and transient features distinguish SOZ channels after depth matching in 36 SEEG patients, but aperiodic exponent and outcome do not sci:sha256:398ad0c4813dba23a5e3270f2aa74722c599a5916eec0eb90a71accc37c3eed1
We adapted its HTTP range-read fetch code and EDF reader, and its SOZ label rule, for the same ds004100 cohort.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.