Ten spread minutes gave an uncertain later STE HFO order gain in 18 SEEG records under independent, exchangeable patient sampling. Circular exposure was equal.
We tested whether ten spread minutes improve later HFO channel count order in 18 public SEEG records. The source was OpenNeuro ds005398 version 1.1.3. The first 30 minutes supplied samples. The next 30 minutes supplied target counts. Each rule used ten minutes per sample. Circular placements gave both rules equal minute exposure. Nine continuous placements had two parts in real time. Mean STE order agreement was 0.76817 for spread samples and 0.75925 for continuous samples. The gain was 0.892 percentage points. Its descriptive 95 percent patient interval was [-0.016, +1.900] percentage points. The interval assumes independent, exchangeable patients and includes zero. The exact two-sided sign value was 0.093018 under joint null sign symmetry. The gain changed sign when both later channel counts had to be positive. Neither SOZ AUC interval established a clear mean gain. With equal source means, a raw squared error difference equals the placement variance difference for any fixed common target. This identity cannot establish closer tracking of later mean changes. The cohort has prior use. The local plan preceded new scores but was not externally registered. The package preserves source bytes, retrieval pins, new count tables, code, scores, figures, and rebuild instructions. Independent checks passed. All 19 analysis outputs repeated byte for byte. We checked all 94 pinned public inputs again. We did not test complete signals, true event identity, or clinical benefit.
high frequency oscillations · stereoelectroencephalography · sampling · channel order · seizure onset zone · equal exposure
References
6- usesTen one-minute samples spread across an hour gave an uncertain mean SOZ AUC gain over a continuous ten-minute sample for STE HFO counts in 18 SEEG sleep records sci:sha256:af08abad6a5d6d676a6782296ab206c5f0d8b61bf3e9898a285c96d95f79ff0b
Its spread sampling comparison in this cohort informed our question and SOZ check. Our main test uses separate later counts and exact equal circular exposure. No score from that work was an analysis input.
- usesMatched HFO counts had lower mean later STE rank agreement than all STE counts in 18 SEEG records sci:sha256:73170d969e459e9579d8f3424c9361847e1ec1965b005b1170396470f687f20a
We reused its 94 source archives, source manifest, and retrieval code. We checked all pinned public bytes again. New code built minute counts and later order scores. No prior score table supplied a new score. The original MIT notice is retained.
- usesSpread 60-second samples gave 0.48 percentage points higher mean overlapping HFO list agreement in 135 SEEG sleep records, with equal weights for seven patients sci:sha256:405e297fae9e0c153d7253bdd497f1e879661f2735443f62f739f452f3258939
Its spread sampling and later list test in another dataset informed our question. Our test uses another cohort, pair order, ten-minute exposure, and a circular exposure control. This work does not replicate its dataset or endpoint.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005398.v1.1.3
Source event tables and channel metadata: OpenNeuro ds005398 version 1.1.3.
- doi:10.1111/epi.18545
- doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04549-2
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesSTE retained an all-channel mean SOZ AUC lead over MNI across all matched ten-minute choices on a first-hour minute grid in 18 SEEG records
This publication supplied the unchanged source archive, pinned manifest, and preparation and retrieval code. They enabled the new exact matched interval bound audit.
- usesFive spread minutes gave an uncertain STE prediction gain in 18 SEEG sleep records under independent, exchangeable patient sampling
Its circular sampling comparison informed the early and later split and the sampling question. This study uses five-minute noncircular partitions and later probability loss. These are the same patients, not an independent cohort replication. No prior score is an input to a new score.
- usesA 95 percent bootstrap interval included zero gain from joint shaft sampling for later STE HFO mark counts in 18 SEEG sleep records under an independent, exchangeable patient model
Used its time sampling results to define the fixed split and the limits about time changes. No model code was copied.
- usesA 95 percent bootstrap interval included zero gain from joint shaft sampling for later STE HFO mark counts in 18 SEEG sleep records under an independent, exchangeable patient model
Used its time sampling results to define the fixed split and the limits about time changes. No model code was copied.