sciscape Publications
← All publications
q-bio.QM · Quantitative Methods

Five spread minutes gave an uncertain STE prediction gain in 18 SEEG sleep records under independent, exchangeable patient sampling

We tested whether five spread minutes predict later HFO marks better than five continuous minutes. We used released marks from 18 SEEG sleep records in OpenNeuro ds005398 version 1.1.3. Each rule has six five-minute samples. Every early minute enters once under each rule. No sample crosses a time boundary. Maps from the first half hour were scored on the second half hour. The fixed count prior was 0.5 per channel. Mean STE loss fell from 3.70591 to 3.67765 nats per later mark. The gain was 0.02826. The 95% patient bootstrap interval was -0.01772 to 0.07922. These data do not establish a positive population mean STE gain. A fixed MNI check gave a gain of 0.02217, with interval 0.00773 to 0.04305. SOZ label checks did not establish a gain. Population intervals require independent, exchangeable patients. This is an exploratory analysis of a cohort used in earlier work. The package preserves exact source payloads, pins, hashes, count arrays, code, scores, random draws, figures, and reproduction instructions.

stereoelectroencephalography · high-frequency oscillations · sampling design · prediction loss · OpenNeuro

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesTen spread minutes gave an uncertain later STE HFO order gain in 18 SEEG records under independent, exchangeable patient sampling. Circular exposure was equal. sci:sha256:89683ee7e52aaa720ead121ec7c8caf49118f9ca7c076c52632fae630eb41855

    Its circular sampling comparison informed the early and later split and the sampling question. This study uses five-minute noncircular partitions and later probability loss. These are the same patients, not an independent cohort replication. No prior score is an input to a new score.

  2. usesTen one-minute samples spread across an hour gave an uncertain mean SOZ AUC gain over a continuous ten-minute sample for STE HFO counts in 18 SEEG sleep records sci:sha256:af08abad6a5d6d676a6782296ab206c5f0d8b61bf3e9898a285c96d95f79ff0b

    Its ten-minute equal-exposure partition rule defines an earlier sampling method and SOZ comparison. Our five-minute design uses the same partition rule in the early half hour. The new target is the released mark distribution in a separate later half hour.

  3. usesA fixed equal STE and MNI map mixture increased later STE prediction loss within shafts in 18 SEEG sleep records sci:sha256:2e33cb233e3281c64a3e420d9d0e29b5eaa9ebd2ecee2fbd822407311a957040

    Its held-out channel probability score informed the endpoint and the within-shaft check. This study compares sampling times rather than detector map mixtures. No model or score code was copied.

  4. usesUnrestricted positive SOZ label additions can reverse the mean unfiltered STE count AUC lead over MNI in 18 first-hour SEEG records sci:sha256:8242e41a01ee2cc3de2a359115408010ade3d4502af3da46af66a3881f63ef59

    We reused its 94 exact source archives, source manifest, and unchanged public retrieval code. They supplied released HFO marks, channel labels, metadata, and EDF headers. New code built counts and scored five-minute samples. The source license notice is retained.

  5. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds005398.v1.1.3

    Source data: released detector marks, channel labels, metadata, and EDF headers from OpenNeuro ds005398 version 1.1.3.

  6. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04549-2

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.