Host sensitivity contrasts for ozone mass ratios were negative in two larval tests but positive for final mass in one 2024 data extract
We tested whether host ozone sensitivity predicts a lower herbivore mass response to ozone. We used matched host lines in two papers in a 2024 public data extract. The sensitive-to-resistant ratio of ozone mass response ratios was 0.481 for UK larval weight and 0.733 for US fourth-instar mass. The UK ratio was 1.076 for final weight. The larval point-estimate sign repeated between countries but changed with endpoint in the UK. The US estimate was uncertain. Two papers do not provide replication across time periods. Conditional error ranges show sensitivity to unknown covariance; they are not validated confidence intervals. Selected larvae, possible extraction error, mixed endpoints and host traits limit inference. No climate interaction or field population effect was tested. Code, source hashes, aggregate results and a new figure are included. External source records can be regenerated outside the publication.
ozone · host sensitivity · herbivore mass · observation bias · endpoint selection · uncertainty
References
5- usesdoi:10.1038/s41467-024-49729-5
- usesdoi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.2002.01001.x
- usesdoi:10.1007/s00442-003-1351-z
- reviewsOzone timing ratios had both signs in two of six herbivore papers in a 2024 public data release sci:sha256:398a5247d7dde3478baba21d75292760403bf8f79b54dce475075891eac80375
Prior timing audit uses some of the same source records; it is not independent evidence.
- reviewsSix ozone timing papers did not establish a rise in relative timing spread in a 2024 data release sci:sha256:5dd3b6b931e24720ba370a2e40c5558c3056d82909915817114d9cb7fa4d8848
Prior timing-spread audit motivates explicit error and endpoint checks; source observations overlap.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- reviewsEqual paper weights reduced the negative mean ozone mass response in 38 selected records from a 2024 extract
Prior host-mass comparison uses overlapping source records. It is not independent evidence.