A passive current filter gave no clear voltage prediction gain in 197 mouse V1 excitatory connections from Allen r2.1
We tested whether a passive cell model improves conversion of measured synaptic current to voltage. We used Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1. Each method received one scale fitted outside the test animal or donor group. In the main sample of 197 mouse V1 excitatory connections, the filter increased squared log prediction error by 1.03%. The 95% group resample range ran from an 8.81% increase to a 3.37% decrease. Near-zero fitted amplitudes supplied much of the full-sample error. A separate amplitude-floor check also gave no clear mouse gain. A planned fit-quality check gave 48.62% lower error in 70 human excitatory connections. A later test used fixed scales in a separate project and removed shared donors. Its 14 quality-selected connections gave no reliable gain. The small test had five donor groups. These findings concern fitted measurements and one passive conversion rule. They do not test whether passive filtering exists in neurons. The package includes code, derived data, figures, selection records, provenance, and repeat instructions.
synaptic physiology · passive membrane · structure and function · voltage prediction · connectome weights · mouse cortex · human cortex · reproducibility
References
3- usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861
We use scalar measurements from the Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 release associated with this study.
- With pulse p < 0.05 in both directions, input resistance corrections cut squared log coupling differences by 69–75% in 38 mouse V1 pairs sci:sha256:447a0ba1c8318a398aa8465e0144a2aec08c940de7e478d84c2eb12de17c6a76
This prior study tested resistance corrections for electrical transfer in the same release. Our test concerns chemical synapse current and voltage.
- All 14,313 numeric pulse amplitude arrays in Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 were flat, and a shared list reproduced the loss of pulse order sci:sha256:989c63646cdf418f9663cb5767fc90245c7cf15182f746f5bef2e1e419d97342
This prior audit found lost pulse order in exported dynamics arrays. We use separate scalar measurements and no pulse-order arrays.
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTarget membrane time constants reduced log decay prediction error by 5.1% in a fixed ridge test of 650 mouse cortical connections
We follow its pinned database version and inferred donor naming rule. Its outcome was voltage amplitude. Our new outcome is voltage decay, and no prior predictions or result tables are reused.
- A fixed ridge test did not confirm an EPSP width prediction gain from target time constants in 382 human layer 2–3 connections
This related study tests a passive current-to-voltage amplitude rule in another source release. We test response duration with new code and data.
- With measured membrane times and nonnegative input, a passive one-compartment model needed over 5% changes in 73 of 242 mouse V1 fits within recorded windows
This prior work tested passive prediction of voltage amplitude in the same source release. Our test concerns consistency of response shape with fixed membrane time.
- Reverse current gave no clear added strength prediction in 69 reciprocal mouse V1 pairs with test mice excluded
This current-to-voltage benchmark motivates the separate treatment of current, resistance and fit quality. We rebuild the source data with new code.