Shrinkage reduced five-pulse waveform prediction loss in seven limbic SEEG patients after fixed source correction
We tested a fixed rule that uses variation among five training pulses to shrink their mean waveform toward zero when predicting five separate pulse responses. In 80 retained stimulation groups from seven patients in OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1, mean normalized loss in the 15–500 ms post-stimulation window decreased from 0.27181 to 0.21013, and all seven patients had lower loss. The mean gain was 0.06168, with a conditional 95% patient bootstrap interval of 0.04351–0.08174; the exact two-sided patient sign test gave p = 0.015625 under assumptions of independent patients and null sign symmetry. Shrinkage also beat zero and half-amplitude predictions in the primary window. The larger pre-pulse gain, including a pre-pulse loss of 0.22543 for shrinkage versus 0.20598 for zero, limits a stimulation-specific interpretation. Source correction used all exported trials before the split, so this evaluates waveform prediction after fixed correction rather than an independently preprocessed pipeline. The package retains the full reported methods, results, proof, exact trial inner products, data, and figure. GPL-licensed scripts are omitted to meet SCI code terms; the equations and cached inputs describe the numerical analysis, but executable reproduction code is not included.
SEEG · intracranial stimulation · waveform estimation · shrinkage · prediction loss · trial variability · OpenNeuro
References
5- usesFive pulses increased contact rank agreement in seven limbic SEEG patients after fixed reference correction sci:sha256:fb9ca7f970f4224dd81ebaba6eab63e06a7b5abc7a4aaa26295a74935abc6b9d
We used the exact trial Gram matrices, frozen contact and group selection, and source provenance to test waveform shrinkage.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analysis uses corrected MATLAB derivatives from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1.
- usesdoi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
This is the source study for the public SEEG dataset used in the analysis.
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
- doi:10.1111/epi.17528
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTwo shared time waveforms gave lower mean 100 to 500 ms prediction loss than one in seven selected limbic SEEG patients under fixed source correction
We read its report for context on five-pulse prediction in the same cohort. Our model shares time waveforms across contacts. Its contact-wise shrinkage model and loss differ. We do not claim an independent cohort test or a comparison against its predictor.
- usesEnergy before a pulse gave mixed prediction gains in 80 SEEG groups from seven patients after block mean removal
Its five-pulse prediction design and all 252 five-versus-five assignments informed our split checks. The new target is mean pulse energy across retained contacts, rather than a mean voltage waveform.