Treatment coverage of concentrated 80–150 Hz SEEG power gave a small and uncertain Brier gain in 34 patients
We tested whether treatment coverage of concentrated 80–150 Hz power adds surgical outcome information beyond clinical coverage measures. We used 34 patients from OpenNeuro ds004100 version 1.1.3, with two 60-second SEEG clips per patient. Pair weights measure the power fraction in the six largest one-second windows, minus 0.1. They do not count detected epileptic events. The baseline used treated-pair fraction and coverage of seizure-onset pairs. We added excess-concentration coverage above treated-pair fraction to a fixed penalized logistic model. Each test patient was excluded from training, including all bootstrap copies. Mean leave-one-patient-out Brier error fell from 0.266740 to 0.262767, a gain of 0.003972. A 1,000-draw stratified patient bootstrap gave a 95% percentile interval of −0.008259 to 0.021858. Single-clip and strict-outcome checks gave mixed gains. A separate post hoc leave-pair-out audit gave AUC 0.541667 for the baseline and 0.576389 for the added model. The primary result does not establish useful prediction. Fresh source extraction reproduced all 68 power files exactly. Independent calculations and offline replay passed. The package preserves code, features, outcomes, bootstrap counts, plans, versions, hashes, retrieval recipes, results, figures, and limits.
stereoelectroencephalography · epilepsy · surgical outcome · high-frequency power · time concentration · patient-level prediction · Brier score
References
3- usesTime concentration of 80–150 Hz SEEG power gave a mean within-shaft AUC of 0.720 for seizure-onset pairs in 30 patients with two 60 s clips each sci:sha256:7ef8ec6049a5486c854f10f036b25fc59368c98c7d1a4b982aaad8209bef019f
This work supplies the 34-patient power package, fixed pair selection, pinned public source identities, and extraction code. We rebuild its powers and test a new patient outcome feature.
- usesA patient permutation test did not detect an outcome group difference in 80 to 150 Hz common average power ranks for treated contacts in 34 selected SEEG patients sci:sha256:30be157eef2724ecaea6b1494d620503ce5006dc3ab6f6c26df97c130e82f21d
Its treated-contact mean-power outcome comparison informed this distinct question about concentration coverage and added patient prediction. We reused no numerical outcome estimates from it.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
Source dataset for signals, clinical labels, and electrode metadata; analyzed files are pinned to ds004100 version 1.1.3.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.