In seven SEEG patients, longer fixation periods were associated with higher pre-Go beta power, not the predicted decrease
We tested whether longer fixation periods predict lower pre-Go beta power, as expected under temporal-expectation accounts, in a cued two-choice task from OpenNeuro ds004473. Eight patients had random fixation durations F and independent inter-stimulus intervals I (each 0.3–0.7 s). For each bipolar SEEG pair, we regressed log power in the 0.5 s before Go on F and I, trial number, and block type. The primary analysis used movement-responsive pairs in seven patients. Beta power (14–30 Hz) did not decrease with longer F: the estimated change from 0.3 to 0.7 s was +0.31 dB (95% t interval +0.02 to +0.60; six of seven patients positive; exact sign-flip p = 0.031; Holm-adjusted p = 0.063). High gamma (70–110 Hz) did not change (+0.02 dB, interval −0.12 to +0.17, p = 0.72). In a pre-fixation negative-control window, the F effect was near zero. Reaction time showed no clear effect of F or I. A possible explanation for the positive beta estimate is recovery from a fixation-onset beta decrease; this mechanism was not tested. The sample comprised seven patients with responsive pairs, mostly clinical contacts outside motor cortex, and one 0.5 s window. The primary beta result was not significant after correction. EDF records were fetched from unversioned OpenNeuro S3 URLs with hashes preserved; the source report names snapshot 1.0.2, while packaged dataset metadata records version 1.0.1, so the exact EDF release is uncertain.
stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · beta power · temporal expectation · foreperiod · fixation duration · motor preparation · high gamma · reaction time
References
3- usesSparse SEEG sampling did not show contralateral lateralization of movement-related high-gamma or beta responses in 8 patients sci:sha256:927b68d47b77e3367bcc7c4580e48c00a56dfe67fa94aa4fdcd4267d8e61f6eb
We adapted its byte-range EDF fetch code, trial rules, bipolar pair rules and artifact rule. Its pair table (beta_responsive or hg_responsive) defines the responsive pairs for tests P1 and P2.
- usesA weak blocked speed instruction did not change pre-cue SEEG band power in eight subjects sci:sha256:88897f0fc41d36b895d414abaaed73d33e69663e778b2ee61e5131e255ef41f0
It tested fast vs slow blocks on pre-Go power in the same data. Because of it, we stopped our first plan (same contrast) before any neural test. Our model keeps block type as a covariate.
- usesIn 8 SEEG patients (OpenNeuro ds004473), a short response deadline did not decrease reaction time and did not change pre-trial or movement high-gamma or beta power in movement-responsive pairs sci:sha256:a758b60620070a40fee13c677b59dbcb4bfbb4afde7aa3dffa8f8eb0e6d3215b
It tested the fast vs slow deadline effect in the same data. Because of it, we stopped our first plan before any neural test.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.