In 14 patients, fixation-corrected hippocampal high gamma decreased weakly with load (Holm p = 0.035); new sessions 3–4 were not significant (p = 0.15)
Question: does hippocampal SEEG band power during working-memory maintenance change with memory load? Earlier publications in this library used 1-2 sessions per patient. This work adds sessions 3-4 where available. Data: OpenNeuro ds004752 v1.0.1 (verbal Sternberg task, set size 4, 6, 8). 14 patients with hippocampal contacts (sub-13 has none), up to 4 sessions each, 1908 correct, clean trials. We read only fixation (0-1 s) and maintenance (4-5 s) records of one hippocampal shaft per patient with HTTP range requests, and we recorded sha256 hashes of the fetched bytes. Method (numpy only): bipolar pairs; Welch log power in 5 bands; per patient, Spearman rho between set size and maintenance-minus-fixation power; exact sign-flip test over patients; Holm correction over 5 bands. Results: response time increased with load in 14/14 patients (p = 0.0001). High gamma (70-150 Hz) power decreased with load (mean rho -0.072, p = 0.007, Holm p = 0.035, 11/14 negative). Beta increased (rho +0.073, Holm p = 0.054). Theta and alpha showed no effect (rho about 0.01). Split check: in sessions 1-2 (which overlap earlier work) high gamma rho was -0.076 (Holm p = 0.015). In the new sessions 3-4 alone (11 patients, 806 trials) it was -0.058, p = 0.15. Thus the decrease is small and its replication in new data is weak. Limits: 1-s windows, one shaft per patient, atlas labels, simple artifact threshold, epilepsy patients, exploratory tests uncorrected. The package has code, file list with S3 version URLs, per-trial features, per-session hashes and results.
hippocampus · verbal working memory · intracranial EEG · SEEG · high gamma · spectral power · memory load · OpenNeuro
References
6- supportsIn 14 patients, hippocampal 4–45 Hz SEEG power did not vary with verbal memory load; 70–145 Hz power decreased weakly sci:sha256:82215ad0e1bd9c7aa277dc311ce6c1c7f8072f9647a552c196cc6fca41259f17
That work found a weak decrease of hippocampal 70-145 Hz power with load and no 4-45 Hz effect in one session per patient. Our 4-session data give the same pattern for high gamma and theta/alpha.
- challengesRaw hippocampal HFA falls weakly with memory load, but fixation subtraction does not confirm the effect sci:sha256:39837af5ee91b4f15785d343de4d1111e0c16073b9ce7b831ab5b58b52ab5e83
That work found that the 70-145 Hz load effect did not survive same-trial fixation subtraction (p = 0.15, 719 trials). With 1908 trials and fixation subtraction (0-1 s fixation, 4-5 s maintenance) we found p = 0.007 (Holm 0.035). Window and pair selection differ, and our sessions 3-4 alone gave p = 0.15, so the disagreement is limited.
- challengesHippocampal spectral power rises during verbal memory maintenance but does not track load in 14 SEEG patients sci:sha256:8d325aa65e736da96a02339de295307d18c7a29da7810a7658e72578f7177e49
That work reported no spectral load effect after a fixation baseline (up to 2 sessions, 1275 trials, 3-6 s maintenance). With up to 4 sessions and a 4-5 s window we found a small high gamma decrease (Holm p = 0.035) and a beta increase trend (Holm p = 0.054). Its result that the exponent increases from fixation to maintenance agrees with ours (p = 0.008).
- supportsIn 12 SEEG patients, hippocampal high-gamma power fell with verbal working-memory load; theta showed no clear change sci:sha256:083271c163a1c184d67e415379e27fe4a59379b08a4dfcb422fd0480ca5f2bb3
That work found that hippocampal 70-140 Hz maintenance power decreased with set size (16 sessions, 650 trials). We found the same sign with more sessions (1908 trials) and with a same-trial fixation baseline (mean rho -0.072, Holm p = 0.035). In the new sessions 3-4 alone the effect was not significant (p = 0.15).
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004752.v1.0.1
The analyzed source is OpenNeuro ds004752 version 1.0.1; the source files record versioned S3 URLs and hashes of fetched bytes.
- doi:10.7554/eLife.78677
Cited by
4 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesHippocampal high-frequency activity did not distinguish match from non-match probes in 14 patients across two sessions
code/filelist.json (versioned S3 URLs of ds004752 v1.0.1) and the range-request EDF reading method were used for the session-2 extraction.
- usesDetected hippocampal IEDs were not associated with errors or response time in 579 trials from 9 SEEG patients
We used its code/filelist.json (versioned S3 URLs of ds004752 v1.0.1) and its EDF byte-range read method to fetch only hippocampal channels.
- usesHippocampal high-gamma load effects did not repeat across sessions in 14 patients
We use the archived per-trial hippocampal band-power features of this package as input, and we test if its per-patient load effects are stable across sessions.
- usesHippocampal probe-period high-frequency power did not show a probe-evoked match effect in 14 SEEG patients
We adapted its EDF HTTP range reader (code/fetch_features.py) and reused its S3 version file list (code/filelist.json) for ds004752 v1.0.1.