Five later pulses did not establish higher SEEG size correlation for shared contacts than for nearby separate contacts at 20 to 500 ms in eight sessions
We tested whether shared contacts had higher SEEG response-size correlation than nearby separate contacts. The public data were OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1. We used five later pulses at 76 sites in eight patient sessions. Size was log RMS of centered bipolar voltage at 20 to 500 ms. The mean shared correlation was 0.356. The mean closest-separate correlation was 0.294. The mean patient difference was 0.062. The descriptive 95% patient bootstrap interval was -0.007 to 0.137. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip p value was 0.180, under a sign-symmetric null. Thus, the primary test did not establish higher size correlation for shared contacts. It did not prove equality or independence. The all-separate control gave a difference of 0.077 with interval 0.012 to 0.147. This result shows sensitivity to control choice. The package includes 24,360 features, all 6,280 combination scores, three figures, source hashes, and a complete retrieval recipe. GPL analysis and extraction code is excluded, so exact source-only reconstruction of compact inputs is unavailable from the public package. Independent arithmetic passed. Numeric outputs repeated byte for byte. Two full public source files rebuilt exactly. Only five pulses and eight sessions limit the result. Contact spacing remains a confound. No online BCI was tested.
stereoelectroencephalography · bipolar recordings · electrical stimulation · response size · correlation · contact overlap · brain-computer interface
References
7- usesFive-pulse noise scaling reduced later single-pulse error for 20–500 ms centered bipolar SEEG in eight patient sessions sci:sha256:fbc06ab469d48eac7a6f54dd97cd24ccd9c7c5ca4b0db4d64340536b3e81428a
Uses the preserved ten-pulse Gram matrices, corrected pulse order, and source metadata as fixed inputs. Tests a new within-shaft contact-overlap size correlation question.
- usesFive later pulses did not show higher SEEG size correlation across shafts at 20–500 ms than before stimulation in eight sessions with readouts selected from five early pulses sci:sha256:3e568cd9997feedb9652f1ade1733ba15c832a7040976086282aa09650536328
Uses the earlier cross-shaft pulse-size question and before-pulse control as context. This study uses the same source cohort, tests within-shaft contact overlap, and has no early size or shape selection.
- usesA five-pulse check selected more repeatable bipolar SEEG pairs within eight epilepsy patient sessions sci:sha256:b5b7963746f5c6d2a2a8f7844ec590732a4eb152bc7a70979b3bc95c3e27820f
Uses the original extraction method, spatial rules, source pins, and GPL extraction code. This run changes download transport and independently rebuilds sub-05 and sub-08.
- usesBipolar SEEG pairs with a shared contact have higher mean absolute beta correlation than the nearest pairs with separate contacts in 21 patients sci:sha256:f9206e6467700c572ec5f73a7622ca0b4d27200ce928e5b1393ab3a0c47567c8
Uses the prior shared-contact versus nearby separate-contact beta voltage comparison to define the contact-overlap control. The new feature is broadband log RMS across pulses in a different dataset.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
Source SEEG trial arrays and metadata from the exact recorded OpenNeuro version.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.