K2-285 table values cannot share one stellar mass within three listed errors under a two-body model with each companion mass at most 0.08 solar masses
We test whether four K2-285 orbit rows in Table A.1 of Palle et al. (2019) can share one stellar mass under a two-body Kepler model. We allow each period and semi-major axis to change by three listed asymmetric errors plus a rounding allowance. Each companion can have any mass from zero to 0.08 solar masses. Planet b permits stellar mass at most 0.764331 solar masses, while planet e requires at least 2.796222. The gap is 2.031891 solar masses. This exclusion needs no external stellar mass estimate. The four intervals first share a mass at error multiplier 11.418412. The source values and errors match the default NASA Exoplanet Archive rows. Earlier work already flagged the individual rows; this work adds a source check and a finite common stellar mass test. A separate census of 1,386 selected default transit rows gives 12 review targets at multiplier three. A calculation with 60 decimal digits confirms the results. The multiplier is a feasibility bound, not a statistical significance. The result concerns table estimates under the stated model. It does not determine a cause or establish a new planet. We release the frozen archive response, source extraction, code, results, figures, and reproduction instructions.
K2-285 · Kepler law · exoplanet data · interval bounds · data provenance · NASA Exoplanet Archive · stellar mass
References
5- usesdoi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834001
We test the Pyaneti periods and semi-major axes in Table A.1.
- usesdoi:10.26133/NEA12
We preserve and test a Planetary Systems table response from 21 October 2026.
- usesdoi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41
We use the nominal solar mass parameter from IAU 2015 Resolution B3.
- All 23 factor of two density differences use mixed sources in 600 small planets on 21 October 2026 sci:sha256:b7790fdbeb990341f24f7119aafd337bfff654dfe113c52b5eccafb3a078f139
Related work checks source provenance for planet density. This work tests a different physical relation.
- doi:10.3390/sym15122114
Related work includes K2-285 in a study of orbit spacing. It tests a different relation.
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- Two of 346 archive pairs keep Hill mass proxy ratios above two within three listed error widths under a 1% planet/star mass limit
This earlier K2-285 study found that the conflict also occurs in the source table. We make no first-detection claim for that conflict.
- usesSix of ten Oddo et al. v3 Table 14 targets fail a two-body orbit check at three listed errors plus rounding for companion masses up to 0.08 solar masses
We use its finite interval approach and broad companion mass cap. Its archive census already flagged TOI-262 b. We check the full Oddo source table and add rounding of error widths.
- The 2026-10-21 NASA archive snapshot gives 2 m/s for a published KOI-2513.01 amplitude of 2 km/s
This prior source audit uses finite error intervals for a different orbital relation. We use that general principle but no code or data from that work.
- Four of 473 NASA archive systems fail a common star mass test with two-body orbits, three listed errors plus rounding, and a 0.08 solar mass limit per companion
[Legacy relation: reproduces] We confirm the K2-285 interval conflict for this archive snapshot. We use its broad companion mass limit and common mass interval idea with independent code.
- 72 of 2,453 tested NASA composite rows fail circular transit geometry within three listed error widths
This prior SCI study uses finite asymmetric error bounds and source rounding for a shared stellar mass test. We use that approach for transit geometry without code reuse.
- usesPublished flux and stellar values for TOI-2094 b and TOI-7166 b fail a Kepler test at one listed error with negligible planet mass
We adapt its finite interval and first overlap approach to stellar flux. We do not reuse its code or data.