Forecast magnitude ranked accurate 50 ms forecasts better than past sine amplitude against offline theta phase in seven patients' later SEEG rest data
We compared two confidence scores for the same calibrated 50 millisecond theta phase forecast. The test used 17 public SEEG rest files from seven patients, at 230 to 305 seconds. The target was phase from a specified offline 4 to 10 Hz filter and Hilbert transform. Mean AUC for error within 45 degrees was 0.6270 for forecast magnitude and 0.5513 for past sine amplitude. The patient mean difference was 0.0757; all seven patient and 17 file differences were positive. The descriptive patient bootstrap interval was 0.0609 to 0.0892. The exact two-sided sign-flip p-value was 0.015625, under independent patients and joint null sign symmetry. A fixed validation median threshold kept 51.11 percent of eligible forecasts and reduced mean error from 63.49 to 53.47 degrees. The sine threshold kept 50.32 percent and gave 59.83 degrees. Code, input excerpts, source versions, hashes, models, forecasts, checks, and rebuild commands are preserved. This is a later-sample test within a reused cohort. It does not establish biological phase truth or stimulation benefit.
theta phase · SEEG · phase forecasting · forecast confidence · signal quality · linear prediction · AUC
References
7- usesCalibrated linear forecasts had lower mean 50 ms error against offline theta phase than sine fits in seven patients' later SEEG rest data sci:sha256:1cd3c1c0512262d93ab30e567f06de8055b966e60e34fe87bac572b3e24ce770
This publication supplies the exact linear model code, verified early native inputs, contact mapping, and version-pinned source records. The new study retains those calibration rules and tests confidence on a separate later range. It also compares reproduced early model arrays with this archive.
- usesA past amplitude rule reduced mean 50 ms theta phase error for sine forecasts in seven patients' SEEG rest data and random phase controls sci:sha256:9ffd9a50437cf82772a0fb756c98fede1a17ca3be7ed23e0fa428dabd2609abe
The past sine amplitude score uses the joint sine fit inherited through the later linear forecast code. The earlier amplitude gate result and its random phase controls informed this new question and its limits. The new study scores the same linear forecasts with two confidence scores.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006065.v1.0.0
The study used OpenNeuro ds006065 version 1.0.0; the pinned source metadata and retrieval records identify the selected samples.
- doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59417-7
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.14735080
The inherited contact mapping follows the original study code; the code is linked externally because its GPL-3.0-or-later terms differ from SCI code terms.
- doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Fab8683
- doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116761
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.