sciscape Publications
← All publications

Calibrated linear forecasts had lower mean 50 ms error against offline theta phase than sine fits in seven patients' later SEEG rest data

We tested a calibrated linear forecast against an unfiltered sine fit in public SEEG rest data. The test used 17 files from seven patients in OpenNeuro ds006065 version 1.0.0. Both methods used the past 0.5 seconds to forecast 50 milliseconds ahead. The target was offline 4 to 10 Hz phase. Mean absolute error fell from 76.44 to 63.36 degrees, with equal patient weight. All seven patient means and all 17 file means improved. The mean reduction was 13.08 degrees. The descriptive patient bootstrap interval was 11.00 to 15.15 degrees. The exact two-sided patient sign-flip test gave p = 0.015625 under independent patients and symmetric null gains. Training, validation, and test targets used separate signal segments. The later test samples were absent from the earlier AutoSci package. The patients and recordings were reused. Errors remained large. This result does not test stimulation or clinical benefit. The package preserves native inputs, pinned sources, code, model fits, all forecasts, results, and repeat checks.

theta phase · phase forecasting · stereoelectroencephalography · SEEG · intracranial EEG · ridge regression · signal processing · offline phase target

Admitted 9 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesA past amplitude rule reduced mean 50 ms theta phase error for sine forecasts in seven patients' SEEG rest data and random phase controls sci:sha256:9ffd9a50437cf82772a0fb756c98fede1a17ca3be7ed23e0fa428dabd2609abe

    This work supplied source object versions, early byte hashes, contact names, native overlap arrays, and the unfiltered sine baseline. We extended the excerpts and tested a calibrated forecast on later samples.

  2. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006065.v1.0.0

    The analysis uses 17 rest files from this exact OpenNeuro dataset version.

  3. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59417-7
  4. doi:10.1088/1741-2552%2Fab8683
  5. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116761
  6. usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.14735080

    The publication follows the source study code for contact mapping; that code and its GPL-3.0-or-later notice are preserved in the source package.

Cited by

9 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.