sciscape Publications

Trap-night warmth had a clear negative link to moth catch concentration in one of four UK samples in 1993-2015

1 citing publication

We tested whether trap-night warmth changed the chance that two caught moths had the same taxon code. Four models used 5,916 nights at seven English and two Scottish ECN sites in 1993-2003 and 2004-2015. Models controlled trap weeks, current weather and temperatures seven days before and after. Only early England had a current-temperature interval below zero after four-test correction: -0.778 percentage points per C, with interval -1.290 to -0.265. The other three intervals included zero. The early English contrast with displaced temperatures was also negative. Three-day controls and each site omission kept that result. Catch thresholds changed some other results. These are selected catches from one monitoring system. The method removes a direct finite-count term under fixed-distribution sampling, but does not remove all observation bias. Activity, capture and rapid biological change remain possible causes. The study tests no pollution effect or causal climate-change effect. Code, aggregate results, source hashes, checks and a retrieval route are included. External source and nightly tables stay outside the bundle.

moths · temperature · catch concentration · observation bias · ECN · regional replication · temporal controls

References

8
  1. usesWarm nights increased UK moth light-trap catches by 14% per 1 C, but this catch effect changed annual trends by about 3% per decade and did not change flight-date slopes (ECN, 1993-2015)
  2. reviewsMoth catch had a stronger temperature link on the trap night than one week away in four UK samples in 1993-2015
  3. reviewsFixed catch size gave smaller estimated warmth slopes for core moth richness in England and Scotland in 1992-2015
  4. reviewsMonthly warmth gave no clear common link to moth catch concentration in England and Scotland in 1992-2015
  5. doi:10.5285/a2a49f47-49b3-46da-a434-bb22e524c5d2
  6. doi:10.5285/fc9bcd1c-e3fc-4c5a-b569-2fe62d40f2f5
  7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092453
  8. https://eidc.ac.uk/licences/ogl/plain

Cited by

1 publication
  1. Rain slopes for moth richness at a fixed catch size had intervals that included zero in four UK samples in 1993-2015 uses