CCEP responses decreased with distance at five stimulation sites in one SEEG patient, while far-response rates varied
We examined whether cortical stimulation pulse trains and stimulated pairs could be recovered from the signal in one patient (sub-112) from OpenNeuro ds006254 v1.0.0, which has no event markers. Seven windows on a fixed time grid were sampled from one 13.7 GB EDF recording; five contained valid 1 Hz trains (14–30 pulses) and adjacent stimulated contacts. For each site, we measured responses in 182 bipolar pairs and defined responsiveness as a maximum absolute z score greater than 6 in 15–300 ms. Response size decreased with distance at all five sites (Spearman rho −0.20 to −0.58; permutation p ≤ 0.005). The responsive fraction below 15 mm was 0.63–1.00. Beyond 50 mm it ranged from 0.02 to 0.51 across sites. At two sites, far responses were repeatable in split halves (median r = 0.92 and 0.85; median peaks at 123 and 88 ms). This result is limited to one patient, five sites selected by a fixed time grid, and 14–30 pulses per site. Pulse count was not equalised, the z threshold depends on noise, bipolar recordings can contain far-field signals, and stimulation sites were inferred from artifacts rather than logs. The four seizure-inducing sites in this patient were not sampled. Coordinates were not checked against anatomy.
cortico-cortical evoked potentials · stereo-EEG · electrical stimulation · neural response · distance · OpenNeuro
References
3- supportsSame-shaft SEEG N1 responses were not consistent across 8 patients at equal distance (median OR 1.39; 5/8 above 1) sci:sha256:4d6ed22b2d695653d8fac87f5e6ae5b0d8f563d3ccd472742fd57797dc7cffb8
Gives a CCEP distance relation in a different dataset (ds006254, 5 mA) with the same decrease of response with distance.
- usesIn five patients, high-band SEEG stimulation artifact decreased with distance but often exceeded baseline at 60–90 mm sci:sha256:96bd371e6afde9782b48481599bd34af2f56faf138b7ebfba7af722ad3c3e99d
Similar artifact and distance analysis of bipolar SEEG stimulation; here applied to single-pulse CCEP responses after the artifact.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006254.v1.0.0
The analyzed sub-112 recording windows and sidecars are from OpenNeuro ds006254 v1.0.0, matching the saved exact-version metadata.
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesPre-pulse 10 Hz magnitude did not predict CCEP N1 in 13 patients with 1 Hz SEEG trains
The pulse detection from the artifact, the artifact interpolation, the 60 Hz harmonic notch and the responsiveness rule (code copied through 44868575) come from this work, and the 5 mA stimulus value.
- usesIn four SEEG patients with inferred pulse trains, distance ranked CCEP responses within patients but poorly predicted response fractions across patients
This work uses the EDF reader and the CCEP extraction code (edf.py, ccep.py) of this publication without change, and applies them to new subjects and a new cross-patient test.
- usesCCEP amplitude did not decrease across inferred 1 Hz SEEG trains in 13 patients; N1 was unchanged
We use its EDF reader, pulse detection, notch and the z > 6 responsive rule without change.