Temperature and flow models fitted to 1950–1993 Bonneville Dam counts did not predict 1994–2025 run timing: sockeye came about 4 days earlier and spring Chinook 5–8 days later
Question: do relations between river conditions and salmon and shad migration timing, fitted to the period that Quinn & Adams (1996) studied, predict the 32 later years? Approach: we used daily adult counts at Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River (1939–2025) and at three upstream dams. We calculated the median passage date of five runs. We fitted models of median date on river temperature and discharge (30-day window, or the date of a fixed isotherm) to 1950–1993 or 1970–1993, and we predicted 1994–2025. Because the scroll-case and USGS temperature records disagree by up to 0.8 °C in 5-year means, we repeated each test with two temperature series. Results: sockeye passed 2.7–4.3 days earlier than all 16 model variants predicted, and the error replicated at three upstream dams. Their year-to-year response to river temperature stayed weak (0.06–0.29 days per day of isotherm date). Spring Chinook passed 4.8–8.3 days later than all 16 variants predicted, although the river was warmer; the best single break is at 2005, and the error replicated at The Dalles and McNary. River conditions predicted 0–34% of the shifts of these two runs. The strong 1950–1993 coupling of shad timing to the 17 °C isotherm date (0.33–0.80 days per day) became weaker after 1993 (0.14–0.39), and the shad advance stopped. Shad had met cooler water each decade to 1993, as Quinn & Adams reported, but met warmer water after 1994. The share of sockeye that passed at 20 °C or more rose to 14–15% in 2010–2025. Fall Chinook timing did not change (negative control). Limitations: the temperature series disagree on long-term warming, so shad results depend partly on the series; counts are daylight counts in fixed run windows; we did not test causes such as stock composition, fisheries, predation, ocean conditions or evolution.
phenology · migration timing · Pacific salmon · American shad · sockeye salmon · Chinook salmon · Columbia River · Bonneville Dam · river temperature · out-of-sample test · climate change · fish passage counts
References
5- challengesdoi:10.2307/2265584
We test the Quinn & Adams (1996) shad and sockeye timing relations on 1994-2025 Bonneville data; we reproduce their thermal exposure trends to 1993 but find that the shad coupling weakened and the trends reversed.
- doi:10.1577/T07-008.1
Earlier analysis of spring Chinook timing at Bonneville in relation to temperature and discharge (1970-2006).
- doi:10.1086/662669
Evolutionary and plastic components of the earlier sockeye migration.
- doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00354.x
Climatic factors and interannual variation of sockeye return timing.
- doi:10.1080/23308249.2024.2337434
Review of American shad in the Columbia River.
Cited by
5 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesTwo temperature records give opposite estimates of mean water temperature change at Bonneville sockeye passage, 1970–1993 to 2002–2025
We reuse its retained DART and USGS source bytes and three MIT code files. We limit interpolation to complete gaps of at most three days.
- usesBonneville sockeye counts cut three-day squared log forecast error at The Dalles by 29% in 2000–2025 with fixed ridge models and blank cells set to zero
We reuse its unchanged DART source count responses through retained dataset sha256-5cdd82d47791de119addf16c3480184fd5b37e3da66ea9868c54fb8eab9505eb. Its analysis tested seasonal temperature and flow forecasts; this study tests daily added information.
- usesSockeye passage shifts offset part of the reconstructed rise in hot-day passage at Bonneville Dam, 1960–1989 to 1996–2025
We reuse the Bonneville and USGS source data and three unchanged MIT code files. We add a split of hot-day count overlap into temperature, passage-date and same-year association components.
- usesThe mean 10–90% interval in May–August sockeye counts decreased by 1.4 days at four Columbia River dams from 1962–1993 to 1994–2025
We reuse its retained DART daily source files and compare the reconstructed wider-window quantiles with its tables. We extend its median-date analysis to passage interval length.
- usesRecorded shad and sockeye passage overlap showed no clear mean change at Bonneville Dam from 1962–1993 to 1994–2025
We reuse its unchanged DART daily source files from retained dataset sha256-5cdd82d47791de119addf16c3480184fd5b37e3da66ea9868c54fb8eab9505eb. We write new code to test seasonal overlap.