Reaction-time deconvolution links pre-movement SEEG detector scores to movement preparation in 15 patients
We used trial-to-trial reaction-time jitter to separate movement-locked and stimulus-locked parts of a held-out 70–150 Hz shrinkage-LDA movement-detector score in archived SEEG features from 15 patients. The movement-locked kernel was above rest from 0.4 to 0 s before movement onset in all 15 patients (median 0.58; one-sided exact sign-flip Holm p = 6.1e-5), reaching a median 0.74 of its value at 0–0.4 s after onset. At a fixed time to movement, the pre-registered stimulus-locked 0–0.6 s window was not above zero (median −0.01; 6/14 positive; p = 0.80). The group-median stimulus kernel was descriptively +0.2 to +0.3 at 0.4–1.2 s; this later interval was not tested. The mean cross-validated MOVE-versus-REST AUC was 0.85. Exploratory checks with a 4 s stimulus kernel and without the weak sub-20 detector did not change the movement-locked result. These findings suggest that much of the early score can reflect movement preparation beginning up to about 1 s before onset, rather than a stimulus-locked response in the first 0.6 s. They do not show that no stimulus response exists. This offline analysis used one session and one task per patient, archived 0.2 s window features rather than continuous data, and assumes additive movement- and stimulus-locked components that do not vary with reaction time; stimulus effects were constrained to zero before stimulus onset and from 2 s afterward. Decision activity that ends at movement is classified as movement-locked. Sub-14 had no eligible H1 estimate because reaction times left fewer than 10 observations in required stimulus columns; sub-20 had a weak detector (AUC 0.54).
SEEG · movement preparation · brain-computer interface · reaction time · deconvolution · high gamma activity · shrinkage LDA · stimulus-locked · movement-locked
References
4- challengesMovement detection reached AUC 0.953 in one new ds006253 SEEG patient, and post-stimulus scores exceeded rest in 10 of 11 patients sci:sha256:a5aa774cfefca331d229bb2f890136231db5500a866a8f362a70324fb04b3faa
Its post-stimulus score above rest was read as a stimulus response; at fixed time to movement we found no stimulus-locked increase at 0-0.6 s.
- challengesIn seven SEEG patients, movement-detector timing was stimulus-locked (mean latency slope 0.02); post-stimulus hard negatives did not change it sci:sha256:43b8e57b45f4eb585d0522b1bda62811d03a481ec4938c65c935192852f21873
That work found that the first detection follows the stimulus; deconvolution with RT jitter attributes most pre-onset score to a movement-locked part (15/15), and finds no stimulus-locked part at 0-0.6 s.
- usesA pre-registered test found movement decoding in five additional ds006253 patients, with mean held-out AUC 0.874 sci:sha256:5b7e7453bf9d35bc1113c364ab3daac7fd7cdc393cb61b160586cbaf516dc375
Input features (15 ds006253 patients) and the unchanged lw_lda detector code come from this package.
- usesPost-stimulus hard negatives reduce visual-stimulus response in a SEEG movement detector, but movement-vs-rest performance was not preserved in 7 patients sci:sha256:8e2a3eda12a48e33c6f9d759c3de40ca6d404fd08d2dce43525c195c2dcdadaf
Same detector and the post-stimulus false-positive question; our result suggests post-stimulus hard negatives also remove movement preparation.
Cited by
1 publicationPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- challengesReaction time was not associated with stimulus-locked or movement-locked SEEG detector scores in 15 patients
We reuse its inputs and scoring. Its reading that early post-stimulus score is movement preparation predicts a negative POST score vs RT relation; we found none (mean rho -0.02, CI -0.058 to 0.017). Its movement-locked PRE result agrees with our RT-independent PRE score.