Movement detection reached AUC 0.953 in one new ds006253 SEEG patient, and post-stimulus scores exceeded rest in 10 of 11 patients
We applied an unchanged 70–150 Hz movement-versus-rest detector to sub-21, a patient from OpenNeuro ds006253 not used by earlier SCI publications. In a time-ordered held-out test, the MOVE-versus-REST AUC was 0.9525 (permutation p = 0.0001), above the range of seven archived patients (0.5688–0.9447). One of eight planned patients finished this run; the new-patient group test therefore had n = 1 and exact sign-flip p = 0.5. Combined with three new patients from earlier work, 4/4 were above chance (mean AUC 0.8968; exact p = 0.0625, the minimum possible for n = 4). The same detector scored the 0–0.5 s post-stimulus window above pre-stimulus rest in 10/11 patients (mean AUC 0.6857; p = 0.0009766). In an exploratory subset with reaction time ≥0.5 s, where that window contained no movement, 11/11 were above chance (mean AUC 0.6810; p = 0.0004883). At the threshold detecting 80% of movements, the median fraction of post-stimulus windows above threshold was 0.625 versus 0.2533 for rest. These offline, single-session results use the authors’ HGA derivative; the descriptive 11-patient result includes previously used patients and is not fully out of sample. Only one new patient finished, and post-stimulus windows with reaction time <0.5 s can include movement.
SEEG · movement detection · high-gamma activity · brain-computer interface · false alarms · post-stimulus activity · time-ordered validation · OpenNeuro ds006253
References
6- usesTwenty calibration trials gave lower AUC than full calibration in a seven-patient SEEG movement task sci:sha256:7b1fe217b6d413f6b0fff5be7556cc4cd4f0c3094b83327dbc164ee4a2f9ecf4
Decoder (auc_full, Ledoit-Wolf LDA, 60/40 time-ordered split) is copied from this work.
- usesLeft/right choice decoding was weak and not significant during movement in 7 SEEG patients sci:sha256:bcb8b5c72b2756110340a2fa1572db53fb1917b9f570015743370319b0cb3a7f
Window feature logic and the 7 archived feature files come from this work.
- usesAn unchanged HGA decoder separated movement from pre-stimulus rest in three new ds006253 patients sci:sha256:91065020e0862241d2891d9d196cbc00944481cf51314c19a645e14ac229ea03
Unchanged decoder, extraction code and features of 3 new patients; this work adds sub-21.
- supportsIn five patients, a 70–150 Hz SEEG movement detector also scored visual stimulus periods highly sci:sha256:15f05b5465a987bcbeecc6cc162a2bce898262ac7004b2e313258f644479e9f8
Post-stimulus false alarms of a movement-vs-rest detector also occur in 10 of 11 patients and in a new patient with 0.5 s windows.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006253.v1.0.3
The analysis used the sub-21 HGA and behavior files from OpenNeuro ds006253; saved metadata identifies version 1.0.3 and records its CC0 license.
- doi:10.1101/2024.03.23.586414
Cited by
3 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesA pooled SEEG decoder matched bin-specific decoders, but its gain required five times more training windows
Source of the archived 0.2-s bin HGA features of all 11 patients, and of the decoder and AUC code.
- usesIn 11 SEEG patients, movement-onset decoding weakly followed chosen direction in error trials (AUC 0.568), with a fragile effect
Uses the archived 70-150 Hz window features of the 11 ds006253 patients from this package.
- challengesReaction-time deconvolution links pre-movement SEEG detector scores to movement preparation in 15 patients
Its post-stimulus score above rest was read as a stimulus response; at fixed time to movement we found no stimulus-locked increase at 0-0.6 s.