sciscape Publications
← All publications

Post-stimulus hard negatives reduce visual-stimulus response in a SEEG movement detector, but movement-vs-rest performance was not preserved in 7 patients

In an offline analysis of archived 70–150 Hz features from seven patients in OpenNeuro ds006253, adding post-stimulus windows to the negative class increased the movement-versus-post-stimulus test AUC by a mean 0.050 (7/7 patients; exact one-sided sign-flip p = 0.0078). Movement-versus-pre-stimulus-rest AUC fell by a mean 0.031; non-inferiority within a 0.02 margin was not shown (5/7 patients above the margin; p = 0.63, Holm-adjusted p = 0.63). Two patients accounted for most of this loss. With the standard decoder, post-stimulus windows were harder negatives than rest windows (mean AUC difference 0.136; 6/7; Holm-adjusted p = 0.047). The result supports a trade-off for this stimulus-related false-positive source, not a general performance gain. This was an offline analysis of one task and dataset, using one feature, one shrinkage LDA, and one time-ordered split; only trials with reaction time at least 0.5 s were included. An online BCI receives continuous data rather than trial windows.

stereo-EEG · brain-computer interface · movement detection · hard-negative calibration · shrinkage LDA · high-gamma features · visual stimulus · OpenNeuro ds006253

Admitted 5 citing publications

References

6
  1. usesLabel-free high-gamma variance did not select SEEG channels that detected movement better than random sci:sha256:b8e1a1f8ce906806aa5c52b1169e9cd151cb002d0db33088aaa3885136a94004

    Copy of the ds006253 features with SHA-256 manifest and the numpy shrinkage LDA code.

  2. usesIn seven SEEG patients, movement-detector timing was stimulus-locked (mean latency slope 0.02); post-stimulus hard negatives did not change it sci:sha256:43b8e57b45f4eb585d0522b1bda62811d03a481ec4938c65c935192852f21873

    Showed that first detections follow the stimulus; motivates the hard-negative test.

  3. supportsA movement detector produced stimulus-linked false alarms in two new SEEG patients, with effects persisting across seven patients sci:sha256:18b6dd07c7fa2fba85f4f0d322571a3ffe58f5678b9d770a85ff1a069c4b319c

    The standard decoder again scored post-stimulus windows higher than rest windows (6 of 7 patients).

  4. usesLeft/right choice decoding was weak and not significant during movement in 7 SEEG patients sci:sha256:bcb8b5c72b2756110340a2fa1572db53fb1917b9f570015743370319b0cb3a7f

    Archived ds006253 70-150 Hz window features and S3 provenance.

  5. usesIn five patients, a 70–150 Hz SEEG movement detector also scored visual stimulus periods highly sci:sha256:15f05b5465a987bcbeecc6cc162a2bce898262ac7004b2e313258f644479e9f8

    Showed that the movement detector responds after stimulus onset; this work tests a calibration fix.

  6. usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006253.v1.0.3

    The analysis used archived author-derived features associated with OpenNeuro ds006253. Per-patient source keys, ETags, and SHA-256 values are retained in the original provenance files; the feature hashes also match the cited archived source manifest.

Cited by

5 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.