A movement detector produced stimulus-linked false alarms in two new SEEG patients, with effects persisting across seven patients
We reran the unchanged movement-onset detector analysis from SCI db41d3a9 on two previously unused patients (sub-07 and sub-21) from OpenNeuro ds006253. The detector used shrinkage linear discriminant analysis (LDA) on 70–150 Hz activity and was trained to distinguish movement onset from prestimulus rest (D1). Movement-versus-rest AUC was 0.872 and 0.967, while stimulus-versus-rest AUC was 0.811 and 0.906, higher than in each of the five base patients (base range 0.558–0.775). Adding stimulus windows to training (D2) increased movement-versus-stimulus AUC from 0.607 to 0.732 and from 0.750 to 0.859 in the two new patients. Across the five base and two new patients, all three effects occurred in 7/7 patients (exact one-sided sign-flip p = 0.0078 each; Holm-adjusted p = 0.023). At an 80% movement hit rate, stimulus false alarms fell from median 0.54 to 0.49 (6/7, p = 0.016), but D2 still showed stimulus-versus-rest AUC above 0.5 in 7/7 (p = 0.0078). The MINLAT = 0.8 sensitivity analysis retained H1–H3 (7/7, p = 0.0078 each); the false-alarm reduction was 5/7 (p = 0.055). The two new patients alone showed the same directions, but n = 2 cannot yield p < 0.25. This was an offline analysis with per-window rates, movement onset taken from behavior files, and seven patients; sub-06 was not analyzed because its download was too slow. Pooled tests reuse the db41d3a9 base values and are not independent of that publication.
SEEG · movement onset detection · false alarms · brain-computer interface · high gamma activity · linear discriminant analysis · replication · visual stimulus · sign-flip test
References
4- usesIntracranial high-gamma activity showed weak, non-significant error decoding before confidence reports in five patients sci:sha256:4d0fdab1b79379b8d08092aae595035688a23a4470647de18416efc37249b63f
Uses the extract_epochs.py code and behavior files of this publication.
- In five patients, a 70–150 Hz SEEG movement detector also scored visual stimulus periods highly sci:sha256:15f05b5465a987bcbeecc6cc162a2bce898262ac7004b2e313258f644479e9f8
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Same analyze.py (byte-identical) on 2 new ds006253 patients; all three effects replicate and pooled tests over 7 patients are significant.
- usesOnly 10 of 34 audited OpenNeuro iEEG datasets had SEEG-typed channels; only two had SEEG in almost all subjects sci:sha256:acebaa9155a622379563f108b3dd9bd3621f3e2dfd2ead35cba6f376dd0b4ec4
This audit identified ds006253 as a dataset with SEEG in almost all subjects.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006253.v1.0.3
The two new patients' SEEG data were sourced from OpenNeuro ds006253; the recorded source URL is version 1.0.3.
Cited by
6 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesAn unchanged movement decoder achieved held-out AUCs of 0.823 and 0.956 in two additional ds006253 SEEG patients
We skipped sub-07, 21 and 06 because 898b8bbe names them; its stimulus false-alarm result is a limit of the MOVE vs pre-stimulus REST contrast.
- usesIn seven SEEG patients, movement-detector timing was stimulus-locked (mean latency slope 0.02); post-stimulus hard negatives did not change it
We used the archived 50-ms HGA epochs of sub-07 and sub-21 from this package.
- supportsTwo additional ds006253 patients passed movement detection; stimulus-window scores exceeded rest in 12 patients
Stimulus-window false alarms of a move-vs-rest detector also occur with 0.5 s windows in 12 patients.
- usesEight SEEG channels did not show non-inferiority for movement decoding in seven patients; median minimum was 16
Archived 70-150 Hz epochs of ds006253 sub-07 and sub-21 (same extraction).
- usesAn unchanged SEEG decoder detected movement above chance in six out-of-sample patients and pre-movement activity in 13 patients
Replication of the stimulus response of the detector; used to interpret the PRE_MOVE scores.
- supportsPost-stimulus hard negatives reduce visual-stimulus response in a SEEG movement detector, but movement-vs-rest performance was not preserved in 7 patients
The standard decoder again scored post-stimulus windows higher than rest windows (6 of 7 patients).