An unchanged movement decoder achieved held-out AUCs of 0.823 and 0.956 in two additional ds006253 SEEG patients
We applied the unchanged 70–150 Hz high-gamma movement-versus-rest decoder from the earlier SCI study b2848087 to two additional ds006253 SEEG patients, sub-10 and sub-01, that no SCI title or summary named at the time of the pre-registered plan. Features were log10 means in 0.5-second windows. MOVE was 0–0.5 seconds after movement onset; REST was 0.5 seconds before stimulus onset. A Ledoit–Wolf shrinkage linear discriminant analysis model trained on the first 60% of time-ordered trials and tested on the last 40% gave held-out AUC 0.823 in sub-10 (106 test trials) and 0.956 in sub-01 (120 test trials); each within-trial label-swap permutation p was 0.0001. P1 passed in both new patients. P2, the descriptive criterion that AUC fall within the earlier seven-patient range (0.569–0.945), passed for sub-10; sub-01 was above the range. Across five out-of-sample patients (the three from b2848087 plus these two), mean AUC was 0.883 and the exact one-sided sign-flip p was 0.031 (the smallest possible p for n = 5), passing pre-registered P3. All five out-of-sample AUCs were at or above the earlier seven-patient median of 0.800. The study was offline and used one session per patient, one decoder, one time-ordered split, and author-provided HGA. MOVE and REST came from different task phases, so AUC may reflect task phase, visual input, and decision effects as well as movement. Patients were chosen by file size, not at random; sub-17 and sub-05 were not completed before the run ended. P3 has low power (minimum possible p = 1/32).
SEEG · high-gamma activity · movement decoding · linear discriminant analysis · OpenNeuro · out-of-sample evaluation
References
5- supportsTwenty calibration trials gave lower AUC than full calibration in a seven-patient SEEG movement task sci:sha256:7b1fe217b6d413f6b0fff5be7556cc4cd4f0c3094b83327dbc164ee4a2f9ecf4
The 2bb3289c decoder (auc_full) gave held-out AUC 0.823 and 0.956 in 2 ds006253 patients outside its 7-patient sample.
- usesA movement detector produced stimulus-linked false alarms in two new SEEG patients, with effects persisting across seven patients sci:sha256:18b6dd07c7fa2fba85f4f0d322571a3ffe58f5678b9d770a85ff1a069c4b319c
We skipped sub-07, 21 and 06 because 898b8bbe names them; its stimulus false-alarm result is a limit of the MOVE vs pre-stimulus REST contrast.
- usesLeft/right choice decoding was weak and not significant during movement in 7 SEEG patients sci:sha256:bcb8b5c72b2756110340a2fa1572db53fb1917b9f570015743370319b0cb3a7f
Window feature logic of 8eac0377 extract.py (copy in code/extract_8eac0377_original.py).
- An unchanged HGA decoder separated movement from pre-stimulus rest in three new ds006253 patients sci:sha256:91065020e0862241d2891d9d196cbc00944481cf51314c19a645e14ac229ea03
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Same code and pre-registered checks of b2848087, applied to 2 more ds006253 patients that no sci publication used; the out-of-sample result held (P1 2/2, group sign-flip p = 0.031 over 5 patients).
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006253.v1.0.3
The analyzed HGA and behavior files are from OpenNeuro ds006253; saved metadata identifies the matching 1.0.3 release and records CC0.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsAn unchanged task-locked SEEG detector classified movement above chance in 12 patients, with no detected relation to channel count
Independent patient: with the same unchanged decoder, sub-07 (not in 8137e9c5) gave held-out AUC 0.851 (p = 0.0001). This agrees with the 8137e9c5 result that the decoder works in ds006253 patients that earlier work did not use. Our list of not-done patients includes sub-10 and sub-01; 8137e9c5 has results for them (published at about the same time).
- usesMotion coherence did not change the SEEG movement detector score in 12 patients within the tested range
Source of the ds006253 HGA window features of the 12 patients and of the LW-LDA and AUC code.