Four-pair seizure detectors showed similar detection for seizure-1 onset and clinical SOZ pairs
We compared two rules for selecting four bipolar pairs for an RNS-like detector in 20 patients with stereo-EEG (SEEG) from one center and 57 later seizures in OpenNeuro ds004100 v1.1.3. Runs were treated as seizures in recorded order. The seizure-1 rule (S1) selected the four pairs with the highest 20–100 Hz z-score in the first 10 s of the first seizure; SOZ4 selected four clinical seizure-onset-zone pairs. Each pair was z-scored against its own [-40, -25) s baseline. The detector used the maximum z-score across pairs and alarmed after two consecutive windows at or above 5 SD. The primary endpoint was the fraction of a patient's later seizures detected within 10 s (D10). S1 and SOZ4 had similar HF D10 (0.64 vs 0.66; difference +0.01, 95% CI -0.23 to +0.24; p = 0.66; 19 patients). Line-length results were also similar (0.71 vs 0.78; p = 0.94), as were pre-onset false-alarm fractions (0.25 vs 0.26). Both rules detected seizures about 3 s earlier than random four-pair sets (S1 vs random: HF p = 0.008; line length p = 0.019). The top four pairs from each test seizure's own onset map, an oracle and not a usable selection rule, reached D10 0.93 (p = 0.004 vs S1). This pattern indicates that onset pairs varied across seizures and limited fixed four-pair rules in this sample. All pairs together reached D10 0.94 but had 0.69 pre-onset false alarms. Limits include one center, clinical onset marks, run order used as seizure order, per-seizure baseline normalization, only 25 s of pre-onset data for false-alarm assessment, few seizures per patient, and wide confidence intervals. The primary comparison was null and does not establish equivalence.
stereo-EEG · seizure detection · responsive neurostimulation · seizure onset zone · bipolar channels · line length · high-frequency power
References
3- usesOne-seizure SEEG onset maps predicted later onset pairs in 20 patients sci:sha256:67ad8d229163793857c7e18fb1ba4fc4ca4fd1d3f7e275852131f30b0a6198b6
We use the per-second HF and LL feature files of this publication as input. Its prior-map result agrees in direction with our PRIOR4 secondary test.
- supportsIn 20 HUP Patients, Few-Pair Detectors Were Faster on SOZ Contacts, but Full Non-SOZ Sets Matched Them sci:sha256:a16aaa8d88006807165a5e6d81824a0e567acebdeb7e3b9a8f07a31f94b1098f
Like this 2-pair result, small SOZ channel sets detected seizures earlier than random or non-SOZ sets; we extend it to 4 pairs and to seizure-1 onset pairs.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004100.v1.1.3
The analysis used ictal SEEG features derived from OpenNeuro ds004100 v1.1.3; the exact version and CC0 license are recorded in the source provenance.
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- supportsClinical SOZ pairs show a small power rise 1–5 seconds before the SEEG onset mark
Both show that SOZ and onset pairs carry early detectable 20-100 Hz activity; this work adds the time before the clinical mark.
- In 20 SEEG patients, learned channels did not detect seizures earlier than clinical SOZ channels
[Legacy relation: reproduces] Same question (few onset pairs from other seizures vs clinical SOZ pairs) on the same patients. We used a different detector (z >= 3 for 3 s, not 5 SD for 2 s), leave-one-seizure-out selection, a latency outcome and k = 1-8. The result is the same: no difference from SOZ, about 3 s faster than random pairs, much slower than the pairs of the test seizure.