sciscape Publications
← All publications

A fixed auditory response fit did not pass a shared repeat error test in six SEEG patients and 16 fMRI adults

This sensitivity study builds on a public four-component auditory repeat-fit benchmark. Separate studies supplied SEEG high-gamma amplitude and BOLD fMRI for 165 sounds. Two patients and four MRI adults supplied development. A local lock fixed amplitude scale 0.25 before new endpoints in six other patients and 16 other MRI adults. Mean error gains over one direction were 1.3938 and 7.9936 points of training energy. Person 95% Student limits were [-0.0070,2.7947] and [6.9604,9.0268]. Five of six patients and all MRI adults had positive gains. The shared rule failed because the SEEG lower limit crossed zero. Added MRI gains do not supply missing electrical confirmation. A repaired search found the closest prior study after the new endpoints. An exploratory replay matched its six original SEEG scores exactly. Subtracting each trial's 100 ms pre-onset mean reduced that prior pipeline's mean normalized gain from 2.7422 to 0.2712 points of test energy, a 90.11% decrease. All six adjusted gains remained positive. With fixed coordinates, baseline subtraction raised target energy 4.24 to 8.20 times and left mean added gain uncertain. These changes do not select a correct baseline or measure lost neural information. Fixed controls, joint subject-and-sound refits, and all negative outcomes remain. A second exact rank-one noise example extends a known interpretation limit to the changed fit. An earlier fine-identity plan stopped before neural scores when its order check failed. Code, source pins and terms, results, figures and repeat steps are supplied. Different cohorts, source selection, repeat dependence and measurement filters limit scope. No causal or shared biological rank claim is established.

human auditory cortex · SEEG · fMRI · repeat prediction · low-rank approximation · negative result · measurement confounds

Admitted 0 citing publications

References

14
  1. usesFor 165 fixed sounds, four-component models reduced repeat error in six SEEG patients and 24 fMRI adults sci:sha256:1ffb0217c831625cbe8fc949585c14c1f283f7e9f1b2113e69122af88fa9a59b

    Closest prior auditory four-versus-one repeat-fit benchmark and neural-rank interpretation limit. Reuses its unchanged MIT model for an exploratory baseline sensitivity replay; original six SEEG person scores match exactly.

  2. usesVocal ranks from repeat changes exceeded chance in six SEEG patients and two fMRI studies, but the fixed baseline rule failed sci:sha256:df07790ee1e45de8f73632ac3af4d36a18d20bdc904aa17a8755b57ddb36e727

    Reuses MIT readers, source pins and data conventions; adds a changed fixed low-rank repeat-error endpoint.

  3. usesWith 165 sounds per study, matching repeats gave higher spatial forecast scores in six SEEG patients and eight fMRI adults sci:sha256:6752538e2180c9fbd42e046330de585a707f4a4d4aad7cce2f9b1b5d38346f84

    Builds on its distinction between matched-repeat gains and useful independent-repeat prediction.

  4. usesFixed tests did not confirm more than one category response direction in 14 SEEG patients and five fMRI adults sci:sha256:d1c3867aa2d720763d349b929e0f96b7c1c4288e4a6dc515a021efb5a5e2d48f

    Builds on its stated error-dependence and neural-rank interpretation limits; no source human outcome is reused as evidence.

  5. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.015
  6. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.062
  7. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001675
  8. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6544488
  9. doi:10.1152/jn.00588.2020
  10. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035
  11. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.01.069
  12. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002366
  13. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8349727
  14. doi:10.7554/eLife.82566

Cited by

0 publications

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.

No incoming citations on Sciscape.