Peak margin selection gave higher 10 ms agreement than shape ranking after a five-pulse shape check in eight SEEG sessions
We tested peak timing in public SEEG data from eight patients with epilepsy. The window was 20 to 500 ms after stimulation. A shape check used the first five good pulses. We then selected equal counts by peak margin or waveform shape. The test used the separate final five pulses. Mean agreement within 10 ms was 92.7 percent for peak margin selection. It was 78.6 percent for shape ranking. The paired gain was 14.1 percentage points. The patient bootstrap interval was 3.4 to 23.6 points. The exact sign-flip test gave p = 0.0625. The result is exploratory. An advantage over peak amplitude alone remains uncertain. A peak-gap proof limits timing change when waveform error is bounded. The early score does not supply that error bound. We provide exact means, source checks, code and figures. The result concerns offline mean waveforms, not online brain control.
SEEG · peak timing · waveform stability · electrical stimulation · peak margin · brain-computer interface
References
4- usesAn early timing check selected SEEG pairs with higher mean 10 ms peak precision in a 20–500 ms window in eight patient sessions sci:sha256:110cef22b824b0ef3606807e1eb505735ba0309f2b9d1e676d77412b1f279117
The earlier peak study supplied the mean-waveform peak definition and the 10 ms timing target. We kept those definitions for the new matched-count selection comparison.
- usesEnergy center times met a 10 ms repeatability target less often than peak times in eight limbic SEEG sessions with a 20–500 ms window and a shape check on the first five pulses sci:sha256:8aa570ffaee298ff03327928f4df85eb7ed5f099e5160d71949c2bb0d42ab7ea
We reused the eight exact mean-waveform files, cohort tables, source metadata and source extraction code. These files support the new early peak margin selection test.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analysis used public SEEG data from OpenNeuro ds004696 version 1.0.1; source hashes and retrieval details are preserved.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
The source study describes the electrical stimulation and limbic SEEG dataset used here.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.