Contact mean removal retained spoken and mimed word label association for a fixed classifier in one SEEG participant under exchangeable labels
This study tests contact mean removal for a fixed word classifier in one public SEEG participant. It uses 342 trials, 19 word items, and 110 contacts from VocalMind. The classifier trains on five filename repetition groups and tests on the sixth. Mean removal gave 14.04 percent accuracy for spoken trials and 14.04 percent for mimed trials. Chance was 5.26 percent. Both passed label controls with Holm P = 0.0105 across nine primary tests. Full features gave 17.54 and 20.18 percent. The test assumes exchangeable labels within repetition groups. Recording order is not established. Shared visual cues and movement can affect the result. No imagined primary score passed its control. A proof shows invariance to common log-power offsets and nonzero trial voltage gain. Numerical checks confirmed this property. All 357 source trial features were rebuilt from pinned public raw files and matched exactly. The package preserves code, feature data, source hashes, all model scores, label controls, four figures, and reproduction instructions. The result supports a gain-invariant readout benchmark. It does not establish a useful speech interface or a speech-specific neural source.
stereoelectroencephalography · brain-computer interface · word classification · log power · contact mean removal · gain invariance · permutation test · spoken speech · mimed speech · VocalMind
References
5- usesSpoken and imagined task SEEG patterns matched for 19 words in one participant under exchangeable word labels sci:sha256:de42a84ec68163186569927aebfbc2d96c47d125992ca12d5322608d3dc44a3d
Its contact pattern analysis helped define the question. This study tests word classification and gain invariance in the same public participant sample.
- usesA SEEG power classifier trained on spoken trials gave 6.83 percent balanced accuracy for 20 imagined word items in one participant sci:sha256:acba984d9e9a4769346f785ddea358590e3b31967715ff505e64b14d22cbe78b
This study uses its feature data, trial metadata, source readers, and retrieval records. All features were independently rebuilt from complete pinned public raw files.
- usesdoi:10.5281/zenodo.14696348
Source VocalMind trial data under CC BY 4.0; the analyzed source files and their hashes are recorded in the package provenance.
- usesdoi:10.82901/nemar.nm000251
The analysis used the NEMAR nm000251 BrainVision conversion, version 1.0.0, and independently rebuilt the features from its pinned raw files.
- doi:10.1038/s41597-025-04741-2
Describes the VocalMind dataset and participant tasks used as the source context.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.