sciscape Publications
← All publications

A 252-session drawdown gave no clear gain in weekly Nasdaq direction forecasts in a 2018–2025 archive test

We tested whether the log gap from the past 252-session closing high improves weekly Nasdaq Composite direction probabilities after past returns and volatility are included. Dated ALFRED records supplied the inputs. Each forecast used a Saturday archive and prices through Thursday. Its target ran from the next Monday session close to the following Monday session close. The main test has 401 fresh-input weeks in 2018–2025. The drawdown model increased mean Brier loss by 0.27% against the matched comparison model. The 95% interval for loss reduction was −0.68% to +0.15%, from paired 13-week blocks. The past positive-return share had lower loss than either fitted model. All fitted probabilities were above 0.5, so their 61.60% accuracy matched an always-positive rule. Sixteen stale-input weeks remain in a separate check. All 834 training states passed timing checks. A fresh-process repeat matched 14 result files exactly. The package has code, forecasts, fit states, source records, uncertainty draws, figures and repeat instructions. This is a fixed historical test for one index and one input. It does not establish reliable return skill or trading profit.

stock return prediction · direction probabilities · drawdown · 52-week high · point-in-time data · chronological test · Brier loss · negative result

Admitted 1 citing publication

References

6
  1. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00695.x

    The stock-level 52-week-high result motivates a separate index-level weekly probability test. Its abstract and bibliographic record were reviewed.

  2. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm055

    This work motivates a useful historical reference in market return forecasts. We use the historical positive share for a binary target.

  3. doi:10.3386/w10009

    This work explains the relation between volatility and direction probabilities.

  4. doi:10.1198/016214506000001437

    Proper probability scores support the Brier and log-loss comparisons.

  5. usesPast return signs gave no clear gain in weekly Nasdaq Composite direction forecasts in a 2018–2025 archive test sci:sha256:06bae42443a1d68efce78aee593a9cea7736fc196ddc48bc60188231389786bd

    The verified study informs the delayed weekly target, simple probability reference, fixed conservative penalty and known archive-gap handling. Our added input is distance from a past closing high. The market and years overlap.

  6. usesRecent losses gave no clear added daily forecast gain in fixed Nasdaq Composite models in a 2018–2025 ALFRED test sci:sha256:a86f9653e622fd72f8ef41036928f807d0acf6a393a31e7b890283013b1b7584

    We reuse the unchanged ALFRED source retained with this research line and use own-origin archived features with first-release endpoint labels. We test a different input and weekly probability target.

Cited by

1 publication

Public catalog entries on Sciscape.