Soma distance reduced squared delay prediction error by 10.9% in fixed ridge tests of 729 inhibitory connections from mouse V1
We tested whether soma distance adds transmission delay information beyond cell labels in sampled cortical circuits. We used Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1. Five fixed ridge tests kept whole inferred donor groups out of training. In 729 mouse V1 inhibitory connections from 265 donor groups, adding distance reduced mean squared prediction error by 10.86%. Root mean squared error fell from 0.459 to 0.434 ms. A later donor bootstrap with model refits gave a central 95% gain range of 3.43% to 19.83%. The gain was 8.82% in 693 inhibitory connections at most 200 micrometres apart. The adjusted inhibitory slope was 0.325 ms per 100 micrometres, with a donor-cluster interval of 0.246 to 0.404. Positive slopes remained within source neurons and within target neurons. Checks using current-clamp delays, source Cre labels and response strength also kept positive inhibitory slopes. Prediction gains in 410 mouse and 116 human excitatory connections were less certain. All 2,665 nonmissing released latencies matched weighted values from accepted source fits. A later test on the common cohort of a related SCI study gave a 9.15% gain in 712 inhibitory connections, with a full-refit range of 2.82% to 17.62%. A fresh rebuild reproduced 92 numerical files exactly. The package preserves code, cohort IDs, predictions, resample draws, aggregate data, figures, provenance and repeat instructions. These are selected slice recording graphs. Soma distance omits axon and dendrite routes, and response onset includes release and filtering. The results support a distance term in the tested models. They do not identify conduction speed or a species effect.
synaptic delay · structure and function · mouse visual cortex · synaptic physiology · soma distance · donor validation · connectome models
References
6- usesdoi:10.1126/science.abj5861
We analyze its public Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 delay and cell-pair records.
- usesDetected reciprocal links gave no clear increase in initial 50 Hz facilitation in 203 mouse and 90 human excitatory cortical connections sci:sha256:18f0d5dfe535372c2e310055773a60609bc06f2ebd09df5a20bd991e075a6f3a
We use its metadata-based approach to donor grouping in the same source release. Our outcome is scalar transmission delay.
- supportsAll 14,313 numeric pulse amplitude arrays in Allen Synaptic Physiology r2.1 were flat, and a shared list reproduced the loss of pulse order sci:sha256:989c63646cdf418f9663cb5767fc90245c7cf15182f746f5bef2e1e419d97342
Its pulse-array audit motivated direct checks of the separate scalar latency fields. We do not use the affected arrays.
- supportsdoi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.199653
Its experiments show that cortical latency includes biophysical effects beyond axonal conduction.
- supportsdoi:10.1038/s41593-025-02134-7
It provides prior evidence for a soma distance and synaptic latency relation in separate human cortical recordings.
- usesWith cell group and session controls, response delay increased by 0.31 ms per 100 micrometres of soma distance in 1,094 mouse V1 connections sci:sha256:677998cfaf2cc7a7f0b9d84bf645c1da51d9591a9435853556ef55b62b973190
A final search found this overlapping distance-delay study after our initial analysis. A later check uses its cohort IDs with our separate source-sign models. We add full-refit uncertainty and separate within-cell checks; this is not an independent biological replication.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.