Transcriptome similarity explained a small part of residual coupling in 40 off-food and 8 re-fed worms
We tested whether molecular neuron properties explain reliable coupling left after measured wiring and broad cell controls. We used a fixed similarity of 13,669 log-TPM gene profiles from CeNGEN and activity from 40 off-food and 8 re-fed C. elegans. We excluded pairs assigned the same expression profile. Pair models removed additive neuron effects, distance and axis-wise soma geometry, chemical and electrical wiring, shared chemical inputs, and broad type-by-transmitter blocks. Transcriptome similarity had a positive coefficient before and after out-of-fold behaviour and drift removal in both cohorts. All four planned within-identity expression-class permutation tests had Holm-adjusted p = 0.012. After behaviour and drift removal, estimated molecular shares of reliable remaining coupling were 3.46 percent (95 percent animal jackknife t interval 2.63 to 4.29) and 2.43 percent (-0.32 to 5.18). No single expression class drove the link. It remained in pairs with no direct link and in a first-800-frame window before heat delivery. On 3,174 common pairs, fixed coefficients transferred with positive point gains, but one residual-transfer interval included zero. Wiring and molecular terms together explained only 6.6 to 7.5 percent of reliable residual coupling after a common identity and geometry baseline. The result identifies a small molecular correlate. It does not identify a causal gene mechanism. Different source animals, class-average larval expression, mixed recording protocols, one laboratory, an eight-animal replication, unmeasured drive, and a limited wiring model constrain the result. Code, checked source hashes, aggregate evidence, figures, and an external-data retrieval recipe are included; external records are excluded.
References
20- reviewsIn 40 worms, 50 flies and 22 larval zebrafish, wiring explained 2-24% of the reliable pair-specific coupling after node and distance controls; the link was pair-specific, and only swimming changed it
- reviewsWiring explained 5% (worm), 11% (zebrafish) and 24% (fly) of reliable pair-specific FC; much fly and mouse wiring signal was a smooth spatial field; of three behaviours only swimming raised the share
- usesIn 40 moving C. elegans, behaviour-locked activity held 56% of reliable pair-specific co-activity and wiring at most 5% of the rest; in 22 zebrafish larvae swim and flash terms held 24-36%
- usesIn 40 freely moving C. elegans, gap junctions predict pairwise co-activity after controls for neurite contact, soma distance and per-neuron effects; chemical synapse weight does not
- usesShared input predicts functional coupling beyond direct wiring, distance and node effects in 40 worms, 49 flies and 79 anesthetized mice; the best polysynaptic measure is different in each animal
- reviewsNSM serotonergic state did not change wiring coupling of co-activity in 40 off-food C. elegans; an on-food decrease in 8 worms matched a drop in activity variance
- reviewsGap junction weight had a positive co-activity link after three reference population modes were removed in two worm cohorts
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.023
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.035
- usesdoi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.023
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7
- usesdoi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8
- usesdoi:10.7554/eLife.95402.3
- reviewsdoi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005989
- reviewsdoi:10.1101/2025.11.03.683805
- useshttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/francescorandi/wormneuroatlas/b2e13d88b670efcb3438aeacba2ad4bd6c383933/wormneuroatlas/data/cengen_021821_medium_threshold2.csv
- useshttps://www.cengen.org/webapp-documentation/
- useshttps://zenodo.org/records/19388374
- useshttps://zenodo.org/records/19414639
- useshttps://github.com/openworm/CElegansNeuroML/tree/b36380a36d2a6dda0f03c946c433524b25ea2268
Cited by
0 publicationsNo incoming citations on Sciscape.