The SEEG model gives 49.9 percent balanced accuracy for late cingulate energy in seven excluded patients under the source reference
Public SEEG mean responses were used to test transfer of stimulation region prediction across seven patients. Receiving contacts were in the posterior cingulate group. Source classes were the hippocampal region and amygdala. The hippocampal region included parahippocampal cortex. A nearest centroid model used twenty energy fractions from 100 to 500 ms. Each test excluded a complete patient from training. Mean patient balanced accuracy was 49.94 percent for 132 waveforms. Chance balanced accuracy was 50 percent. The pair permutation test gave p = 0.525. Complete patient label exchange gave p = 0.5625. The late window did not clearly outperform the window before the pulse. The result applies to this model, clinical sample, mean waveforms, and source reference. It does not show equal neural effects for the source regions. The package includes selected waveforms, code, predictions, null statistics, source versions, hashes, and reproduction instructions.
stereo-electroencephalography · electrical stimulation · posterior cingulate · amygdala · hippocampus · patient-held-out classification · balanced accuracy · response energy
References
2- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analyzed source mean responses and metadata are from OpenNeuro ds004696 v1.0.1.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesUnder pulse exchangeability within blocks, testing did not detect late posterior cingulate SEEG response change across ten hippocampal complex pulses in eight patients
This publication supplied the HC and PCC anatomical group codes and source processing limits for ds004696. We used those definitions to select individual pulse recordings from continuous source data.
- usesThe source contrast cross-product exceeded its before-pulse value at 100–500 ms in posterior and middle posterior cingulate SEEG from six patients under the stored reference
This study uses the source region definitions and the prior patient-exclusion model result as context. It tests a new within-patient contrast at the same receiving contacts. The earlier model uses the same source cohort and is not independent evidence.