Cross-pulse energy reduced pre-pulse rank agreement more than post-pulse agreement in five-pulse maps from seven limbic SEEG patients with a fixed reference
We tested whether the energy measure changes contact rank agreement in public SEEG stimulation data. We used 80 groups from seven patients in OpenNeuro ds004696, version 1.0.1. Each group had ten selected pulses and 126 separate five-versus-five partitions. Cross-pulse energy excludes products within the same pulse. It reduced pre-pulse agreement from 0.688 to 0.054 and post-pulse agreement from 0.848 to 0.680. The post-minus-pre contrast increased by 0.466 across patients. Its conditional 95 percent bootstrap interval was 0.339 to 0.590. All seven patient contrasts were positive; the exact two-sided sign-flip probability was 0.015625. A fixed Gaussian control showed stable conventional ranks without a mean response when contact noise levels differed. The result uses the fixed source reference and does not establish true connection strength. The package preserves code, fixed inputs, provenance, complete results, figures, and source retrieval instructions.
SEEG · intracranial stimulation · cross-pulse energy · rank agreement · neural trial variation · limbic system · bootstrap · Gaussian model
References
4- usesFive pulses increased contact rank agreement in seven limbic SEEG patients after fixed reference correction sci:sha256:fb9ca7f970f4224dd81ebaba6eab63e06a7b5abc7a4aaa26295a74935abc6b9d
We used the fixed ten-trial inner products, example voltage traces, selection records, source hashes, and retrieval code. These files permitted an exact energy comparison across all 126 complementary five-pulse partitions. The prior conventional rank summaries informed the question. The source reference correction stayed fixed.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004696.v1.0.1
The analysis used the OpenNeuro ds004696 dataset, version 1.0.1, as identified in the publication text and version-specific dataset metadata.
- doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2201-22.2023
- doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011105
Cited by
2 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
- usesThe variation fraction was higher at 50 to 250 ms than at 20 to 50 ms in eight-pulse SEEG maps from five patients
This publication supplied prior use of the Q minus sample-variance-over-count correction and cross-pulse energy in SEEG maps. It informed our estimator and its error-model limits. Our added test compares variation fractions in fixed eight-pulse early and late ventral temporal windows.
- usesThe variation fraction was higher at 50 to 250 ms than at 20 to 50 ms in eight-pulse SEEG maps from five patients
This publication supplied prior use of the Q minus sample-variance-over-count correction and cross-pulse energy in SEEG maps. It informed our estimator and its error-model limits. Our added test compares variation fractions in fixed eight-pulse early and late ventral temporal windows.