Independent choices of 100 selected EEG seconds gave posterior theta-to-alpha AUC limits of 0.637 and 0.964 for 36 Alzheimer and 29 control ds004504 v1.0.9 records with common average reference
This study tested how sample choice changes a fixed posterior theta-to-alpha EEG score. It used all 36 Alzheimer and 29 control records in OpenNeuro ds004504 v1.0.9. The score used a common average reference and pooled powers from ten accepted ten-second epochs. Each person could have a separate choice from every consecutive accepted-epoch sample. Some samples contained grid gaps. The exact attained AUC limits were 0.636973 and 0.963602. The range width was 0.326628. Of 1,044 person pairs, 341 could have either strict score order. A family with one common fractional start had AUC limits of 0.823755 and 0.904215. With 36 positive and 29 negative labels assigned uniformly at random, selection after labels were known had exact expected maximum AUC 0.716827. Any fixed sample choice independent of those labels had expected AUC 0.500000. A proof shows why the independent limits are attained and gives the random-label expectation. Separate code checked all candidate scores and 9,999 random-label draws. Fresh source downloads reproduced three records. A second complete analysis matched all ten scientific output files byte for byte. These results describe permitted selection effects in this finite cohort. They do not estimate clinical test accuracy or the frequency of such selection. The package preserves code, matrices, every candidate, attained choices, source hashes, metadata, one complete offline source example, results, and reproduction instructions.
electroencephalography · sample selection · area under the curve · theta-to-alpha ratio · Alzheimer disease · random labels · signal processing
References
4- usesCommon average reference changes posterior theta-to-alpha ranks in 88 ds004504 v1.0.9 records with source processing fixed sci:sha256:2047e7d0ae35196950f5421eb9237a3b0a817c451fabcbdedd0b92ad776f3431
This study reused its complete band cross-power matrices, epoch map, source audit, metadata, and extraction code. Saved hashes fixed these inputs. They enabled exact limits over all permitted EEG samples. Three fresh source records reproduced the matrices.
- usesA fixed EEG model predicts shuffled labels when training and test sets share the 88 ds004504 subjects sci:sha256:7ba0bee1f809898d24fefdeb839b4d53689a26bcea0ff0429014af5f5ef0c2a9
The reused source retrieval and boundary code adapts this publication. Its license notice is preserved. The present study did not use its classifier results.
- usesDistant 50-second EEG samples have larger RMS posterior theta-to-alpha log-ratio changes than adjacent selected samples in 88 ds004504 v1.0.9 recordings sci:sha256:28cd89b3c33f2b2e90970ab2901903785d3cd736b651608116ee8287cc3695ff
Its comparison of distant and adjacent posterior EEG samples informed the sample-choice question and local plan. Its result tables were not inputs. The present study gives attained AUC limits and an exact random-label expectation.
- usesdoi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004504.v1.0.9
The study analyzed processed EEG records and metadata from OpenNeuro ds004504 v1.0.9; the source files were pinned by their recorded hashes.
Cited by
0 publicationsPublic catalog entries on Sciscape.
No incoming citations on Sciscape.